Syrian Nuclear Reactor - Now you see it, Now you don't!

Maybe the Nuclear reactor blew up? ...maybe not seeing as it would have had bigger outcome!

 

where did GRIM said it was bombed?

 

Lol iul, i'll leave it at that

 

no, seriously...he sais he wants to see some proof it was a nuclear reactor and you answer by asking him where is the proof it was bombed. What's up with that?

 

They really scrambled to hide the evidence.

The problem is that they probably learned a lesson here. They are now likely to go underground (literally) with their nuke program, just like Iran did.

 

Imo we should be more afraid of countries that don't hide their nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors.
Do you want some examples ??

 

I should have expected nothing more from the likes of you

I actually was hoping for a link I could read that had some decent info, you know to show it was a nuke site. I guess you do not have one and simply love attaching to anything and everything blindly, you've proven this over and over in the past.



So far the 'proof' has been the roof looks similiar to a korean structure, the possible of cooling the facility as it's designed, and the fact that they 'shock' cleaned up a bombed site. There of course is no other reason to clean up a bombed site.

Great proof, but then I guess it's better than the proof you had for the Iraq war that you bought hook line and sinker

 

They are still searching it in the oil they are stealing from the Iraq people , Iraq is still under occupation.

 

I was just reading about this on CNN, how dejua!

 

Why the hostility, GRIM? Surely this isn't the first time you've heard of this incident? There are hundreds of reports on this incident where *some* information has been released in terms of the "proof" that's selectively demanded. Why are you holding others accountable for doing your research? What's your agenda, this time?

http://news.google.com/news?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=syrian+nuclear+reactor&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn

It's really amazing what you continue to choose to take issue with, and what you don't.

 

GRIM, did you want to challenge this one, or should I?

 

I asked for a solid article, something to read.

You are the one always demanding links, yet when they are given you claim they never were.

I have read article after article and see nothing even close to proof, I was hoping someone here had something or substance. I guess that is not the case.

Someone also claimed Syria had stated it was a nuke site, I did research and it turns out that was a known error on a translator. Shocker the person never responded.

I guess asking for proof is to much, we should just blindly believe

Kind of like you did with Iraq and 'shock' turned out to be totally wrong on. Sorry I prefer facts, not fiction.

 

Syria and nuclear weapons ? Hahahahaha

I mean get your facts straight people. Syria is not even trying. Or is making guns and bullets in the middle east already considered as WMD and potential threat to the world peace ...

 

BTW I had not 'issue' I guess it's to much to ask for a link to a solid article.
You'd think those who are so afraid of Syria would have read some good articles, something to convince them.

So far I see alot to do about nothing.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=axcjEHGDc9fg&refer=home

Read this link from Gtechs link

All the other articles have barely even a loose amount of speculation, nothing substantial, nothing worthy IMHO from what I read.

Funny I thought someone always used to attack AC for posting search links like this?...

 

Demanding others do your work for you.

So now your laziness is my fault? Do you take Lithium?

That's because you are blind and agenda driven. It's also heresay. Why would I trust what you claim? I just posted a link to nearly 800. Even the original article has the "proof" you demand of others to provide for you.

More heresay. Just like the fact that the surge in Iraq is working, you don't want the truth. Your agenda will not allow it.

You blindly believe anything, and in fact, never question anything, that serves your agenda. I've pointed it out countless times. Then accuse others of doing the same. There's a word for people like that.

I have no idea what you really prefer, but I know it's not the truth. Just like in the "surge is working" thread, you exhausted yourself trying to prove it wasn't, because success for our troops isn't part of your agenda. In reality, it was and still is working and those death tolls for both our men and women that you denied success for, and civilians are down. Not everyone was disappointed.

Just another illustration of such. Red shoes are green, blue shoes are white

 

That's usually what blind people see.

 

Man get out of the cave
Read some book. Even Harry Potter would do....

 

Not a big harry potter fan, but thank you for the kind offer.

I'd prefer to read up on those facts that the blind man can't seem to find.

http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1311

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/104864.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/24/world/main3402004.shtml

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5huUBnG1swmDpqMV6Kk7vOIuZ0dzAD8S8LFE80

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/14/wsyria114.xml

Can we get some denial on these? Syria needs some help right now. Someone be a man and stand up for them, please?

 

Nuclear reactor for what ?

 

The mentally obtuse?