Supreme Court Blocks Bush!

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by yo-yo, Jun 29, 2006.

  1. #1
    High court blocks military tribunals

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the Bush administration did not have the legal authority to go forward with military tribunals for detainees at the Guantanamo Bay military base in Cuba.

    The 5-3 ruling means officials will either have to come up with new procedures to prosecute at least 10 so-called enemy combatants awaiting trial, or release them from U.S. military custody.

    The case was a major test of President Bush's authority as commander in chief in a wartime setting. Bush has aggressively asserted the power of the government to capture, detain, and prosecute suspected terrorists in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.

    Continued Here

    ----------------------------------------
    Hopefully the first of many defeats over our president, the war criminal and constitution shredder. :)
     
    yo-yo, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  2. chulium

    chulium Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,438
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #2
    The title of your thread is really misleading. "High court blocks Gitmo military tribunals" would be more appropriate.

    Stop trying to make it seem like everybody hates Bush.
     
    chulium, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  3. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #3
    Not everyone, just 70% of the US, and the rest of the entire world. There's still that 30% of the right-wing US nutcases that worship him. ;)
     
    yo-yo, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  4. chulium

    chulium Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,438
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #4
    We don't worship him. *Mimics yo-yo's smilie* ;)
     
    chulium, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  5. Henny

    Henny Peon

    Messages:
    2,118
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Ain't democracy great!

    I thought Bush stacked the Supreme Court? :confused:
     
    Henny, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  6. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #6
    And based on the title I thought they upheld some anti-porn legislation... you really should be more clear in your titles.

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  7. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    They are brainwashed by liberal media, that's why they decided to block.

    Hmm.. doesn't seem that the Bush administration succeeded into to turning the country into a Kingdom and bringing on the NWO :confused:

    According to Yo-Yo and Anthonocea, it seems that this was their major goal :rolleyes:
     
    latehorn, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  8. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Dishonest, as usual. None-the-less, a great day for terrorists and that's all that really matters.
     
    GTech, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  9. anthonycea

    anthonycea Banned

    Messages:
    13,378
    Likes Received:
    342
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Too bad they did not go by the law of the land in 2000 when that dead man appointed by Nixon gave Cheney the White House!
     
    anthonycea, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  10. Henny

    Henny Peon

    Messages:
    2,118
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Ahh, nothing more satisfying than listening to a hippy whine about the '02 election...
     
    Henny, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  11. Rick_Michael

    Rick_Michael Peon

    Messages:
    2,744
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    I guess I'm neither the 70 or 30....is everything in the world a hate or love situation?
     
    Rick_Michael, Jun 29, 2006 IP
  12. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #12
    Hard to believe people are happy about this ruling.

    Quick question. Who brought the lawsuit?

    Answer: Salim Ahmed Hamdan

    Who is Salim Ahmed Hamdan?

    Answer: He was the driver and bodyguard for one Osama bin Laden.

    Not exactly some dude who happened to be standing around when the US rampaged thru the country. Are you happy that this guy cannot be tried for supporting bin Laden?

    Furthermore, all this decision does is prolong peoples' stay in Camp Gitmo.

    It does NOT say that the camp must be closed, or the people released. So the stays are extended. If you are for these people to be released or put thru the legal system, this is not a positive step. More time to commit suicide is all this 'victory' grants them. Think the US is gonna release them now that this decision has been reached? Not likely.

    All this does is make Bush return to congress to get the legal authority to try these people. At the achingly slow pace that congress can move. Think this is gonna happen quickly? Not likely. Just more wrangling - and indeed - these people get to sit around Camp Gitmo longer.

    Think the Democrats in congress are happy? Think they want to be on the wrong side (voting NO) for Bush's legal authority? Probably not. So justice delayed, is about all this does.

    It simply forces a vote in the Senate (which will inevitably give Bush the authority he requires to try these people). Nothing more, nothing less.

    But, if you want to cheer these people sitting around Gitmo longer and pray that Salim and his ilk go free; please do feel free.
     
    lorien1973, Jun 29, 2006 IP