Please have a look on this: https://twitter.com/HarvardBiz/status/735800473131712516 Caroll Anne answers with a retweet, which is no retweet. It's no normal Twitter Card effect either, cause there is no possibility to tweet this article from the original (there is no tweet link, at least I don't see one): https://hbr.org/2016/05/research-the-link-between-feeling-in-control-and-viral-content So I wonder, how did she do this strange retweet? Do you know?
To make it more understandable: On the profile page of Carol Anne it looks like a Twitter Card tweet (except, above is written: In reply to Harvard Biz Review) But, clicking on the tweet comes the surprise (it appears as a reply!): https://twitter.com/dream2screen/status/735801035491418112
I don't see the problem? She might me just an experienced Twitter user and will know that a reply might appear in your feed. So instead of clicking the retweet button, she just left a comment and changed the structure. If you check out the status again, I've done the exact same thing. Nothing strange, just a trick.
Got it. So basically, here is what you have to do. You reply and add the original link to the tweet. Now it worked, if you check their tweet again, I am also in the reply section with the same card. It is probably part of Twitter's recent updated to exclude links from the character count. Just an assumption.
Thanks for your support. I appreciate it very much. [It seems that a newbie can't give a "like", otherwise I'll would give you one for your problem soving effort...]
No problem dude. It made me really try to solve the problem, because I was curious about how she did it.
I read somewhere the same thing that they "twitter" don't county links/images in their 140 character limit but I don't think that this change has implemented yet.