Strange PR in one of my sub-page

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by FireStorM, Dec 17, 2005.

  1. #1
    i am a bit confused about How a site sub-pages PR are calculated .. Some sites has their sub-pages with same PR as the main page .. for me , most of my sites have sub-pages PR 0 , while the main page has 4 or 3 and my main pages are linked to the sub-pages . can this be explained plz ..
     
    FireStorM, Dec 17, 2005 IP
  2. ServerUnion

    ServerUnion Peon

    Messages:
    3,611
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    You need to get links pointing at the interior pages and wait for a few PR updates.
     
    ServerUnion, Dec 17, 2005 IP
  3. mystikmedia

    mystikmedia Jedi Master

    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    498
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    270
    #3
    ..."a few PR updates"... Really? I thought internal pages usually got PR on the first update if they are linked...
     
    mystikmedia, Dec 17, 2005 IP
  4. ServerUnion

    ServerUnion Peon

    Messages:
    3,611
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Really depends on when the pages are placed, linking structure, and number of internal links.

    Since google takes a snapshot of the site, it is most likely not on the day that the PR update is done.

    Index external links 1-3 weeks
    Index and cache internal page 1-3 weeks

    So I think we are both correct on this one. I dont have any firm examples, but I do see on a lot of my sites, that if the page hasn't been indexed for a while, they dont show PR on the update.
     
    ServerUnion, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  5. Djohn

    Djohn Peon

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    It depends on what kind of a subpage it is.
    Static pages with a link from the main page are more likely to receive PR, as they stay the same over time.
     
    Djohn, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  6. ServerUnion

    ServerUnion Peon

    Messages:
    3,611
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Content has nothing to do with PR IMO, I have blank pages with PR5.

    It has to do the age of the page, the links, and age of links to the page.
     
    ServerUnion, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  7. mdvaldosta

    mdvaldosta Peon

    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    362
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    PR gets passed through links, it's simple. You don't have to have external links to your subpages, a link from a page on your site with PR will pass PR to that page. The more links on that page, the less PR that gets passed through them. A typical PR 4 site without an insane amount of links should get a PR3 pages for those links, but like I said that depends on the number of links. Age of links have nothing to do with PR, and more to do with serps.

    Remember toolbar only gets updated every few months, and if that page was created after the last update then your not going to show any PR until the next update.
     
    mdvaldosta, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  8. Djohn

    Djohn Peon

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Agreed, but /static-page.html is more likely to a a decent PR than /2005/12/google-trivia.html (like a post on a blog), as it's not just one of many posts with individual URL, but a page that stays the same over time.

    My point is that each and every dynamic page has its own PR and doesn't share PR, as in every post having the same PR because they're shown on the post.php page.
     
    Djohn, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  9. mdvaldosta

    mdvaldosta Peon

    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    362
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    The url doesn't matter, if the page is indexed then it passes PR.
     
    mdvaldosta, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  10. ServerUnion

    ServerUnion Peon

    Messages:
    3,611
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    I do feel that links take a while to get valued by google.
     
    ServerUnion, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  11. mdvaldosta

    mdvaldosta Peon

    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    362
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    They do require age to get value, but that value is for search engine rankings. PR is simply based on pages linking to another, with no other variables.
     
    mdvaldosta, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  12. ServerUnion

    ServerUnion Peon

    Messages:
    3,611
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12

    I agree except for querystring URL's like: /test.pgp?ID=10&page=new

    I had a site that had a page say /order.php which was PR4, when I added 2 new pages with a querystring, they instantly showed with PR3. Not saying this is a good way, as we all know at some point the SE's will get bored of indexing querystring pages.
     
    ServerUnion, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  13. mdvaldosta

    mdvaldosta Peon

    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    362
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    A url like that might not get indexed, especially if it's many links from the homepage and no other links going to it. But, with that said, if it get's indexed then it gets and passes PR.
     
    mdvaldosta, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  14. Djohn

    Djohn Peon

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    I'm not saying it doesn't, but unless you get inbound links to every single post or dynamic page, it's unlikely you'll achieve decent PR just by having the paged linked to from the main page a few days on all of them, as it's pushed of the page by new posts (in the case of a blog or news site).
     
    Djohn, Dec 19, 2005 IP
  15. sarwesatish

    sarwesatish Peon

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    it is bcoz ur have not inbound links in ur pages / subpages
     
    sarwesatish, Dec 19, 2005 IP