Some sites remove links

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by Help Desk, Jun 7, 2004.

  1. #1
    Some sites, such as phpBB.com, have forums that remove one's external links. DigitalPoint does not do this. Is there any reason why a site would do this other than to prevent sites from having free promotion? This seems extremely stingy in the least!
     
    Help Desk, Jun 7, 2004 IP
  2. Old Welsh Guy

    Old Welsh Guy Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    291
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #2
    You can get penalised by the search engines if you link to bad neighbourhoods, the favourite at thte moment is to spam forums.

    Some just stop this happening, while others do not seem to care.

    It is down to personal preference
     
    Old Welsh Guy, Jun 7, 2004 IP
  3. disgust

    disgust Guest

    Messages:
    2,417
    Likes Received:
    133
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    how does it remove them exactly?
     
    disgust, Jun 7, 2004 IP
  4. Help Desk

    Help Desk Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,365
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #4
    Help Desk, Jun 8, 2004 IP
  5. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    highrankings forums and others hide links from google to hoard page rank

    thye use a form of cloaking , when the bot visits they give it a different version of the site then a person
     
    ferret77, Jun 8, 2004 IP
  6. disgust

    disgust Guest

    Messages:
    2,417
    Likes Received:
    133
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    wow, interesting- they strip sigs for google but not for users.
     
    disgust, Jun 8, 2004 IP
  7. younghistorians

    younghistorians Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    332
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #7
    IMR is in the process of considering whether to disallow sig linking or not, for the same reasons stated above :(
     
    younghistorians, Jun 8, 2004 IP
  8. Will.Spencer

    Will.Spencer NetBuilder

    Messages:
    14,789
    Likes Received:
    1,040
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    375
    #8
    It doesn't matter too much, phpBB is on the BlockedPR list.
     
    Will.Spencer, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  9. SEO_AM

    SEO_AM Active Member

    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #9
    Is anybody aware of any forums that allow sig links in the posts, but actually blocks them from the SE's? If this is true, it would be sneaky to say the least. This would be really true for the pros that basically make their forums by responding to and helping others. Any forums you know of?
     
    SEO_AM, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  10. disgust

    disgust Guest

    Messages:
    2,417
    Likes Received:
    133
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    highrankings is one. it was mentioned here and I checked it out.

    the sigs show, but if you view the cached page instead of the live one, they disappear completely
     
    disgust, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  11. Voyager

    Voyager Guest

    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Ahhh... that is an excellent test!
     
    Voyager, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  12. younghistorians

    younghistorians Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    332
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #12
    very nice :)
     
    younghistorians, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  13. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    IMR is the only forum that every shows any backlinks for me so far
     
    ferret77, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  14. SEO_AM

    SEO_AM Active Member

    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #14
    Most surfer type forums for the average Web user, not webmaster, would not provide backlinks. No need. But, forums that have savvy webmasters and SEO pros that are members of the forum there to learn and teach on how to move up in the SERPs and gain backlinks will sure as hell want to be given credit in the SE's for their sig links. I, for one, would not participate in the forum if the links were promised, but sneakily disallowed.
     
    SEO_AM, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  15. Help Desk

    Help Desk Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,365
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #15
    The only 3 Reasons that a site might not want search engines to see external links are...

    1. You charge a premium for your advertising and don't want to give your posters a "Free Ride".

    2. You are afraid of PageRank Leakage. In otherwords a site feels that each of its links reduces the sites PageRanking.

    3. Preventing external links minimizes the amount of "SPAM" messages user posts (Because the posters get a lot less out of them).


    Each of these reasons is wrong, a myth or easily preventable. Any guess as to which one reason is which?
     
    Help Desk, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  16. Smyrl

    Smyrl Tomato Republic Staff

    Messages:
    13,740
    Likes Received:
    1,702
    Best Answers:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    510
    #16
    Pornographic spamming on bulletin board with young, as in kid, viewers.

    First I disallowed spidering with robots.txt. Then as temporary measure made index non-viewable as I planned to password protect directory. Found spammer getting in anyway. Before password protecting thought I would try to hide directory structure to see if that would keep him out. Succeeded in hiding and now I can't view to work on forum. I truly do not know what I have done or how to undo. Have had query into host since Sunday for help with problem. Still no response. It is not major issue to anyone but me. I do not like to be had by a sleeze ball.

    Shannon
     
    Smyrl, Jun 9, 2004 IP
  17. Help Desk

    Help Desk Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,365
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #17
    SPAM is always going to occur no matter what. The only resolution is to delete the offenders and notify such places as SpamCop.com.
     
    Help Desk, Jun 10, 2004 IP
  18. SEO_AM

    SEO_AM Active Member

    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #18
    Smyrl I agree with you totally. No pre-screened url should be allowed to be posted on normal chat forums. It should be a hard and fast rule for teen based forums.

    But, for a specialty forums such as Digital Point, SEO Chat and SEO Guy, where the only ones attending the forums are webmasters and SEO folks working hard to get BL's, their reward for providing 90-95% of the knowledge transfer should be the backlinks from their posts.
     
    SEO_AM, Jun 10, 2004 IP
  19. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #19
    Well, personally I that's an excuse for conversing PageRank. :) Does anyone actually have an example of a forum that was penalized (I've certainly never heard of one)?

    Also, Google News and Google Group articles use live links. And since Google applies it's algorithms to itself, they also have the chance of getting penalized if that was the case.

    Sounds more like a link popularity conservation cop-out to me. :)
     
    digitalpoint, Jun 10, 2004 IP
  20. TheBiaatch

    TheBiaatch Peon

    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    It's just mostly warez sites that use it, if they hotlink to micros0ft site, and microsoft will see that they get like 1000 hits in from a warez domain/site they will know something not good is going on...

    Thatz why :)
     
    TheBiaatch, Sep 13, 2006 IP