I am seeing the advice that a blog should submit its most "important" pages to social bookmarking sites. Sounds very reasonable advice. I have a site with 7,500 product pages, 600 section pages. All the section pages are important but is that too many for each social bookmarking site? I need deep links to all my pages, but I wouldn't dare try to submit all 7,500 as 1. google would surely ban me 2. I don't have the time or manpower to attempt that fiasco. I fear 600 pages is too much as well. I know no one knows for sure but any rough idea how many won't draw attention?
I think you can attack your section pages, try to submit like 1 page on each social bookmarking sites, one per day. Try that for 2 months and then you'll have done 60 pages, 1/10th of your sections. If you can make it an habit, then it'll be easy to just go on.
You really need to social bookmark the actual article. That the only fair way to do it. You shouldn't really bookmark your entire site only the specific relevant parts. If you bookmark it all, most social site would bann you for spamming wouldn't they. What bookmarking site are you specifically talking about?
Yes, that's true. I was thinking about things like delicious.com not like digg.com for digg.com it would need to be a product page and even then... I'm not sure how to do it, except by creating articles (talking about a certain need and listing several of your products as solutions) and bookmarking those articles.
I would suggest do bookmarking for each product.. target each section one by one but do bookmarking for all ... bookmarking will surely help you....