so what's the current webmaster seo theory on the most recent google "thing"?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by Kaediem, Apr 13, 2006.

0
Page 2 of 2
  1. compar

    compar Peon

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    169
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    Where is the consistent evidence for that? I think I find more irrelevant searches now than ever before.

    I guess to some degree it depends how you define "relevant". But I'm not sure universities and publications are always more relevant than the manufacturer or seller of a goods or service. For instance, you frequently see Amazon come up in the top ten for searches on some specfic item. How the hell are they in the top ten of relevance for any individual thing except "book sales"?
     
    compar, Apr 16, 2006 IP
  2. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    I'm sorry bob I am being sarcastic

    People for some reason seem to form SEO theories based on articles and forum posts instead of actually lookin at the serps
     
    ferret77, Apr 16, 2006 IP
  3. Sorror

    Sorror Active Member

    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #23
    SERPS based on revelant links to all sites is a bad idea from the start. Try think about business sites. I'll never link to my competitors, just like they'll never do - and they are the most revelant sites for me! The point is G's (and other SEs) results can't base on this factor, it's unnatural case (it'd be workin' only for blogs or entertainment sites).
     
    Sorror, Apr 16, 2006 IP
Page 2 of 2