Site Wide Links! Good or Bad

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by reubenrd, Jun 18, 2008.

0
Page 2 of 2
  1. roy77

    roy77 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #21
    google is smart. If it sees a website linking to another on EVERY page, with the same anchor, url, etc... abviously it is going to know that you $BOUGHT$ the link, which is what google is trying to AVOID (webmasters buying links).
    In conclusion, sitewide links are EXPENSIVE and are not helpful, if not damaging.

    I hope this helps/
     
    roy77, Jun 22, 2008 IP
  2. vjlenin

    vjlenin Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    458
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #22
    google penalizes only purchased links, sitewide or not. It doesnt matter. Also it penalizes sites with links to bad neighborhoods. everything else is just fine.
     
    vjlenin, Jun 23, 2008 IP
  3. jigolo

    jigolo Peon

    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    Yes I am agree with that, I have experienced that also.. :)
     
    jigolo, Jun 23, 2008 IP
  4. snowbird

    snowbird Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,036
    Likes Received:
    395
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #24
    This is not accurate. Just because its a sitewide link does not mean it is paid. I've received numerous free sitewide links because other webmasters liked my content. And I thank them for that! :)

    Now if a sitewide link appears around many unrelated sitewide links, that may be damaging to the link seller. But in most cases the buyer risks only getting that link devalued.
     
    snowbird, Jun 27, 2008 IP
Page 2 of 2