Site directory, should I block from googlebot?

Discussion in 'Google' started by Pierre Monteux, Dec 13, 2006.

  1. #1
    I'm planning on putting a site directory on my website soon because it is growing in size and some pages are moving too far from the main page. As I currently currently envision it, it will consist of almost entirely links with little or no actual content. I know there are heavy penalties for pages that appear to be link spam, and I've read somewhere that pages should not have more than 100 links on them, so should I block google from the page in robots.txt?

    (note. before somebody says it, this page will not have the ads on it).
     
    Pierre Monteux, Dec 13, 2006 IP
  2. instanet

    instanet Guest

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Well if the page is all links to pages within the same site, isn't that just like a sitemap kind of idea?
     
    instanet, Dec 13, 2006 IP
  3. Jon.West

    Jon.West Peon

    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    If they're internal links, no. If they're external links, yes.

    <3 site maps.

    :)
     
    Jon.West, Dec 13, 2006 IP
  4. Pierre Monteux

    Pierre Monteux Peon

    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Ok thanks. Internal links are good, and external links are the ones that get me in trouble. Thanks for the input. There would be a couple external links, but I'll leave them off that page, they are good where the are.

    --Monteux
     
    Pierre Monteux, Dec 13, 2006 IP
  5. rehash

    rehash Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    30
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #5
    I think it's not a big problem to have more than 100 links, it's just not recommended, but many big sites which are well ranked have more than 100 links on certain pages
     
    rehash, Dec 15, 2006 IP
  6. sarathy

    sarathy Peon

    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    76
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    It wont give you any major problems as long as you dont link to spam sites/ link farms linking to spam/junk/adult sites
     
    sarathy, Dec 15, 2006 IP
  7. trichnosis

    trichnosis Prominent Member

    Messages:
    13,785
    Likes Received:
    333
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
    #7
    if you make site directory with quality , you will not be banned from google . but if you make link farm , you may be banned from google
     
    trichnosis, Dec 15, 2006 IP
  8. dreamsubmitting

    dreamsubmitting Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,278
    Likes Received:
    44
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #8
    try to add only good pr or quality sites. So there will no problem to you
     
    dreamsubmitting, Dec 15, 2006 IP
  9. kh7

    kh7 Peon

    Messages:
    2,715
    Likes Received:
    109
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    You should have a sitemap to make it easier for visitors and google to find all your pages.
    There is no problem with also having a links-directory or something that links to external pages. Just organize the links by subject and only link to sites you actually feel would be interesting to your visitors and you will be fine.

    [the term 'site-directory' is a bit confusing - it could mean both a sitemap and a links-directory. Neither will hurt your site, but do not mix them up: that will just confuse your visitors. A sitemap is for internal pages. A (links-) directory is for external pages/sites. Neither will hurt your site and so neither need be blocked from google.]
     
    kh7, Dec 15, 2006 IP
  10. Pierre Monteux

    Pierre Monteux Peon

    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Ok thanks. What I'm putting up now will be just a site map. I'll keep that in mind about directories...I've been a bit skeptical of where the line lay, but I think I get it now.
     
    Pierre Monteux, Dec 15, 2006 IP