should users with red rep be allowed to have sigs?

Should users with negative rep be allowed to have a sig at all? I honestly don't think they should. Some responses like "...............no" don't qualify as a post for me so they don't deserve to have a link there. Just my 2 cents...thoughts on this?

 

Agree with you.

Nice suggestion.
It is there when members join, the rule is to have green rep, 10 posts and min. 2 weeks to have signature but this should be done to all the members, not only new.

 

.................no



jk i agree

 

I just mean, should posts like this be allowed a sig? http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1255425&postcount=5

Shawn?

 

No No No. I disagre. Because some members here have like a few k posts but have RED rep.

 

Shawn aready has it set up to take the signature out when your rep gets too low. Does IamRed have a signature!!!

 

With thousands of post do you have any clue about why they have red reputation.

 

Obviously not if hes banned already. :?

 

You might not want to hear one of the reasons for this.

 

I think it depends on why they have a red rep. Some of us have red reps because we gave red reps to people who deserved them. Then DP decided to take a point away for doing so after the fact.