sex - sex (.) ws

Discussion in 'Appraisals' started by meetgs, Jun 21, 2008.

0
  1. #1
    What do you guys think of my new domain, sex - sex . ws ?

    The name is already taken in many TLDs
     
    meetgs, Jun 21, 2008 IP
  2. Regine

    Regine Member

    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    35
    #2
    I would say reg fee
    .ws doesnt value that much
    repeating a word is a no no (unless for branding purposes)
    hyphen is a no no (this devaluates the name)
     
    Regine, Jun 21, 2008 IP
  3. htmlindex

    htmlindex Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,748
    Likes Received:
    284
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    315
    #3
    Agreed with the above appraisal & comments as well, don't see value to the name.
     
    htmlindex, Jun 21, 2008 IP
  4. pixeladd

    pixeladd Banned

    Messages:
    2,238
    Likes Received:
    93
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    yeh jus reg fee

    the .com might be worth a bit but noting else
     
    pixeladd, Jun 21, 2008 IP
  5. meetgs

    meetgs Active Member

    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    35
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #5
    Thanks for the comments and appraisal guys.

    Luckily it is still in the grace period so I can ask for refund :p
     
    meetgs, Jun 21, 2008 IP
  6. puremonopoly

    puremonopoly Active Member

    Messages:
    925
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #6
    hmm... actually taking advice seriously on here... not an often circumstance! Usually I see someone ask for an appraisal and then when they get bad results they go back and by a similar low level domain and ask for a new appraisal assuming the last one was a gl!7ch. I agree... all the hyphen domain names haven't ever been in and they won't be any time soon... maybe in another century.. and the .ws hmm... how much extensions are there going to be?! Trial and error and junklist most.. .com or nothing for the commercial macroscale!!!
     
    puremonopoly, Jun 21, 2008 IP