SEO link?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by arale, May 6, 2008.

  1. #1
    Hi

    Which URL type is best for SEO? url_like_this.html or url-like-this.html

    Thanks
     
    arale, May 6, 2008 IP
  2. Silverman

    Silverman Peon

    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    same I think.
     
    Silverman, May 6, 2008 IP
  3. litb2902

    litb2902 Peon

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I think url-like-this.html is better
     
    litb2902, May 6, 2008 IP
  4. webcont247365

    webcont247365 Peon

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Litb why Url-like-this is better for seo -- Any explanation?
     
    webcont247365, May 6, 2008 IP
  5. ezprint2008

    ezprint2008 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #5
    its higher up off the virtual ground _ and eh -
    :)
     
    ezprint2008, May 6, 2008 IP
  6. freelistfool

    freelistfool Peon

    Messages:
    1,801
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Matt Cutts of Google has said that url-like-this is better because that format makes Google see 3 words (url, like, this). While url_like_this makes Google see one word (url_like_this). He has hinted that they might change it in the future.

    That said, I've had good results getting to search engine position with urls_like_this.
     
    freelistfool, May 6, 2008 IP
  7. poshswinger

    poshswinger Active Member

    Messages:
    2,527
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #7
    No difference between the two in eye of search engines.
     
    poshswinger, May 6, 2008 IP
  8. angilina

    angilina Notable Member

    Messages:
    7,824
    Likes Received:
    186
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #8
    I suggest you use this one

    url-like-this.html
     
    angilina, May 6, 2008 IP
  9. funlol

    funlol Member

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    #9
    the url-like-this.html is also better for users as they dont have to press the shift key when typing in the URL
     
    funlol, May 6, 2008 IP
  10. w3bmaster

    w3bmaster Notable Member

    Messages:
    17,594
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #10
    same but - are more estetic then _
     
    w3bmaster, May 6, 2008 IP
  11. JhetBhlak

    JhetBhlak Peon

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    I believe like freelistfool said, Matt Cutts has stated that - is better than _ for URLs. The - is viewed as a space and sometimes the _ is viewed as part of the text. The reason why _ is viewed as part of the text is because a long while back it was used as part of variables and/or constants in programming.
     
    JhetBhlak, May 6, 2008 IP
  12. ebyun84

    ebyun84 Peon

    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    I attended Bruce Clay's SEO toolset course and he said that URLs with dashes are considered more "spammy". Can anyone confirm this?
     
    ebyun84, May 6, 2008 IP
  13. Kngavl

    Kngavl Peon

    Messages:
    964
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Kngavl, May 6, 2008 IP
  14. Sem-Advance

    Sem-Advance Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,179
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #14
    It does not matter

    If you have a real SEO at work... the battle is over before the search engines need to worry about - or _

    ;)
     
    Sem-Advance, May 6, 2008 IP
  15. Hersheys

    Hersheys Peon

    Messages:
    2,591
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    I prefer to use this format url-like-this.html
     
    Hersheys, May 6, 2008 IP
  16. ericajoieake

    ericajoieake Guest

    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    its better to use - than this _! its more advantage to search engine robots!
     
    ericajoieake, May 6, 2008 IP
  17. nonyf

    nonyf Guest

    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    As earlier posters have indicated, I also agree "-" is better than "_"

    Of course, you can achieve top page rank with the right SEO methods regardless. However, that process requires taking every advantage and employing every optimization method. Since Cutts has stated that the "-" has an adventage; why go with the _ if it's only a disadvantage? Take care and best of luck.
     
    nonyf, May 6, 2008 IP
  18. webcont247365

    webcont247365 Peon

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    Okay, let's use (-) :)
     
    webcont247365, May 6, 2008 IP
  19. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    437
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    There is no difference between the two SEO-wise, though I prefer the dashes for accessibility and usability reasons.

    ...and...

    There is no difference, and it was Matt Cutts who broke the announcement that the two would be treated equally.

    Misinformation. They can however make it harder for people to remember the URL if they're overdone.

    No advantage for robots; the advantage is for people. (Is that an underscore or a blank space? I can't remember...)
     
    Dan Schulz, May 6, 2008 IP
  20. Bloomtools

    Bloomtools Peon

    Messages:
    1,361
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    The best URL type

    with using "hifen".
     
    Bloomtools, May 6, 2008 IP