See where your sandboxed site would rank!

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by dazzlindonna, Jan 23, 2005.

  1. Smyrl

    Smyrl Tomato Republic Staff

    Messages:
    13,740
    Likes Received:
    1,702
    Best Answers:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    510
    #21
    If the sandbox involves an age factor, how old are some of the older sites in the sandbox.

    I have a site whose domain name was purchased June 2003. Wayback Machine shows pages for it in November and December of 2003 but version is nothing like what is currently online. I put up site and did not like design so did not link. It was around March of '04 before I started tracking any keywords from site so site is around 9 months old. Trick with "-asdf" shows different results than normal search.

    Incidentally, it appears results I am seeing (with supposed filters) turned off approximates what I saw about a couple of weekends ago when about 6 data centers showed promising results.

    Shannon

    -----------

    Post below by SEbasic attributes difference in results to Hilltop. This well may be. I have never been a big advocate of sandbox theory and had not felt this site was sandboxed but for whatever reason it does better on keyword searches using "-asdf trick".
     
    Smyrl, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  2. Old Welsh Guy

    Old Welsh Guy Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    291
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #22
    Sites don't get sandboxed, it is links that get sandboxed, and mor over link benefit to a site. Because of this it is a search query filter, not a site filter. It is perfectly possible to rank #1 for one phrase, while being sandboxed on another.
     
    Old Welsh Guy, Jan 23, 2005 IP
    Bernard likes this.
  3. crazyhorse

    crazyhorse Peon

    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    So its a matter of time... before you eventually will rank better because of the search query filter . How long can that be..months weeks before the filter is deleted ....if it is a filter.
     
    crazyhorse, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  4. SEbasic

    SEbasic Peon

    Messages:
    6,317
    Likes Received:
    318
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    I highly suggest that you guys read this.

    It will tell you exactly what adding those terms to your query is doing...
     
    SEbasic, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  5. skattabrain

    skattabrain Peon

    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    it's probably not so much an A or B switch ... it's probably a ranking system just like the serps... just in the other direction.

    i noticed the same, some sites make quantum leaps, other sites already doing well on page 1 climb to 1 or closer to one.
     
    skattabrain, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  6. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    SEbasic you arn't making any sense

    if the filter bypasses the mythical hilltop algo

    then wouldn't all the results be different, not just a handful

    the filter doesn nothing to my old sites
     
    ferret77, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  7. ResaleBroker

    ResaleBroker Active Member

    Messages:
    1,665
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #27
    I agree that sites don't get sandboxed but "Age of Page" might be a factor.

    I recently ran a test on a domain registered in 1997. By way of the ad network four-thousand (4000) links were pointed to the home page. Result: Top ten placement on Google, Yahoo, and MSN.

    At the same time I created a "New" page on the same domain and via ad network three-hundred links were pointed to the page. Result: Sandboxed

    I'm not drawing any hard and fast conclusions based on those results but it does make me wonder.
     
    ResaleBroker, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  8. SEbasic

    SEbasic Peon

    Messages:
    6,317
    Likes Received:
    318
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    I don't know what sites you are running, or how competitive the results are, but I can assure you that everything in that article is relevant to using this query.

    I even read a paper a while ago that talks all about this type of query and how the results are as a direct effect of the Hilltop algo (Being switched off).

    I'll try to dig it out again (I should have bookmarked it). If I can find it you'll see exactly what I am talking about...
     
    SEbasic, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  9. Michael

    Michael Raider

    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    92
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #29


    Here is my theory:

    If we imagine for the moment that Google uses a two stage process to determine the SERPs. The first stage produces the raw results and the second stage applies a number of different filters.

    When a few search terms are used all filters are on but as the number of terms increases certain filters are turned off.

    The probability of finding a relevant page is inversely proportional to the number of terms in the search. Allowing pages that might otherwise have been filtered to "pass through" as the number of terms increases ensures that highly relevant normally filtered pages (if they exist at all) become available.

    Or to put it another way, as the number of search terms increases the application of filters become less important and the number of available pages becomes more important.

    Of course it is not a complete theory but I would be interested to hear the views of others.

    - Michael

     
    Michael, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  10. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    I would say I have sites in medium competitive areas, I don't really know how to measure competitveness becasue its objective

    anyways

    like I said "then wouldn't all the results be different, not just a handful"
     
    ferret77, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  11. skattabrain

    skattabrain Peon

    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #31
    i have a site registered in Oct 2000, it climbs from #5 to #1 with the filter.

    can a 5 year old site be sandboxed?

    i agree with michael... there are probably stages of different types of filters.
     
    skattabrain, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  12. ResaleBroker

    ResaleBroker Active Member

    Messages:
    1,665
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #32
    Many of the terms for my five (5) year old site are sandboxed.

    EDIT: I just checked one of my sites from 1999 and there are terms that have been sandboxed too.
     
    ResaleBroker, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  13. zez

    zez Peon

    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    My site at the moment ranks #600+ or 1000+ for my main KW. With this seach is at #6.
    My site site is already 9months old. I think it takes 12 months to get out of the sandox.....
     
    zez, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  14. wrkalot

    wrkalot Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #34
    My site was launched in October of 2002
     
    wrkalot, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  15. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #35
    skattabrain

    I have site that is from 1998 that is sandboxed to hell and is number 1 with the nonesense words

    I think it has been established to some degree that the filter effects links and/or domains or some combination
     
    ferret77, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  16. Smyrl

    Smyrl Tomato Republic Staff

    Messages:
    13,740
    Likes Received:
    1,702
    Best Answers:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    510
    #36
    He he, continually keep flunking sandbox 101. Seriously with age of your site do not think it suffers a new site penalty.

    You might want to post your site to review section and see if anyone has some recommendations for you.

    Shannon
     
    Smyrl, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  17. dazzlindonna

    dazzlindonna Peon

    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #37
    For those of you with old sites - do you have a bunch of new backlinks (within the sandbox time period)?
     
    dazzlindonna, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  18. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #38
    the one I mentioned 95% of links where added in the last 6 months

    on my homepage which is few years old, most of links are from before that period. When I moved to Florida few months ago, I started optimizing my site for local searches like "Florida web design"

    my site ranked in 2-3 weeks

    on a clients site registered in 1996 , his site already had a number of higher pr links, his site ranked top 5 for his terms in less then a month
     
    ferret77, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  19. dazzlindonna

    dazzlindonna Peon

    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #39
    that could very well qualify an old site to be thrown into the new site sandbox.
     
    dazzlindonna, Jan 23, 2005 IP
  20. jamjv

    jamjv Peon

    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    Yeah I remember that, then G shut it down.
     
    jamjv, Jan 23, 2005 IP