'Second Thoughts about Fluoride,' Reports Scientific American (nutters were right?)

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Briant, Jan 2, 2008.

  1. #1
    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=second-thoughts-on-fluoride

    People have been talking about this for years--but they weren't supposed to and were called nuts.
     
    Briant, Jan 2, 2008 IP
  2. ncz_nate

    ncz_nate Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    153
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    153
    #2
    briant - i'm glad someone else on these forums are shedding some light to very important issues.

    yes they put chemicals in our water and in our air. it is a fact - no we are not nuts. fluoride is not good for you and has no health benefits.

    somewhere it is documented (you could google) of a case in where China's government experimented on a small town by putting in rather high amounts of fluoride, and many of the citizens had birth defects and other unnatural health problems.


    so who benefits from all of this? friendly elitists. rich doctors that live lavishly at the expense of your ill health. there are other reasons and groups of people, but there's no reason to dig too much deeper ;)
     
    ncz_nate, Jan 2, 2008 IP
  3. Bernard

    Bernard Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,608
    Likes Received:
    107
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #3
    [​IMG]
     
    Bernard, Jan 2, 2008 IP