It helps quite a bit, but surely, content is king! Your site can be SE optimized to the hilt, if you don't have quality content on it, you aren't going to rank well at all.
They are both right!! You do need rythm (relevancy) starting with making sure that your meta tags, meta description, and your site content, especially the opening text on your homepage at the top, all flow together!! That is what Google likes!! Then......content content content, and then links links links!! They key to success!!
hi u can first make ur sites content is king and then submit ur sitesin lots of free directory submission sites Thanks
there are many factors that come in talk such as: Domain age, Backlinks, Content, Seo factors (headings... etc) and many other key factors: Links on .edu .gov pages, Wikipedia articles. all these have a word to say in your ranking in google.
Really????? I can't agree with you... How can you say like that??? Just have a look at Googles search results description of a newly indexed site..
The age of a domain name has no bearing on SEO. Do you honestly think that registering a domain name then developing it five years later will make a difference to the search engines? Guess what. It won't. As for back links, it's not just the quanity of them, but the quality as well, and whether those links are organic or not. Obviously you're going to want to focus on getting quality links since they'll be worth more in the long run (not to mention more likey to be around later on). Headings have nothing to do with SEO. They have everything to do with semantic Web design and writing conventions. Search engines just happen to pick them up and give them more emphasis because headings are associated with the content around them. Unfortunatley a lot of people seem to fail to understand this concept. Links to .edu and .gov links are not worth more simply because of the TLD. In fact, most .edu links are WORTHLESS because they're crappy user-generated pages created by students. The pages with quality content, such as research papers for example, are the ones you want to go after if you do decide to get a backlink from a .edu TLD. As for TLDs (top-level domains), search engines could care less whether it was a .com .edu or even .xxx (hypothetically speaking on the .xxx TLD, which has been rejected YET AGAIN) - to a search engine, a TLD is a TLD. Wikipedia's practically worthless from an SEO standpoint since they use rel="nofollow" on their links, so while you'll get traffic from that site, you won't get any of the PR from it passed on to you.