SE Friendly Directory

Discussion in 'Solicitations & Announcements' started by guru-seo, Sep 17, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
0
  1. #1
    guru-seo, Sep 17, 2005 IP
  2. webmistress

    webmistress Guest

    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    36
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    The code verification you use on ya directory is hard :S
     
    webmistress, Sep 17, 2005 IP
  3. tulip4heaven

    tulip4heaven Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,774
    Likes Received:
    86
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #3
    My site submited..

    Thanks for sharing
     
    tulip4heaven, Sep 17, 2005 IP
  4. mystikmedia

    mystikmedia Jedi Master

    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    498
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    270
    #4
    Boy, it sure is. Please, please remove it! :)
     
    mystikmedia, Sep 17, 2005 IP
  5. mystikmedia

    mystikmedia Jedi Master

    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    498
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    270
    #5
    I finally got mine added. :) Seriously, you should consider removing that verification. It is hard to distinguish a lot of the characters. I had to try 4 or 5 times for some of the listings. But, all submitted now. Good luck!
     
    mystikmedia, Sep 17, 2005 IP
  6. longcall911

    longcall911 Peon

    Messages:
    1,672
    Likes Received:
    87
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Submitted a few... thanks.
     
    longcall911, Sep 17, 2005 IP
  7. bentong

    bentong Banned

    Messages:
    3,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    submitted on classifieds. thanks!
     
    bentong, Sep 19, 2005 IP
  8. norfstar

    norfstar Peon

    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Added a couple of my sites. Thank you :D.
     
    norfstar, Sep 19, 2005 IP
  9. uca

    uca Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    69
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #9
    WOW, that's the most 'secure' verification coding I've ever seen!:)

    Does it have to be that hard (I never got it wrong but I really had to put some effort into it and I'm sure many have a hard time anyway).

    Just to give you some feedback!:)
     
    uca, Sep 19, 2005 IP
  10. BobL

    BobL Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #10
    Submitted most of mine. Agree with everyone else about the code.
     
    BobL, Sep 19, 2005 IP
  11. Pammer

    Pammer Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,417
    Likes Received:
    397
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #11
    most 'secure' verification coding within well optimize SEO-Freindly sites. I like it, sumission 9 with one blog. thanks for this. ;)
     
    Pammer, Sep 19, 2005 IP
  12. elkiwi

    elkiwi Active Member

    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    34
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #12
    Submitted mine too thanks. Verification is rediculous, sorry.
     
    elkiwi, Sep 19, 2005 IP
  13. maro

    maro Peon

    Messages:
    356
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Submitted mine, took me a while to figure out the verification code please either remove it or make it simpler
     
    maro, Sep 19, 2005 IP
  14. carowan

    carowan Peon

    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    submitted to arts..thanks!
    agree with the code verification, took 3x
     
    carowan, Sep 19, 2005 IP
  15. xio

    xio Peon

    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Thanks.. added 7 sites :0 well.. this verification code is sometimes not readable :) ive mistaken the code like 6 times;)
     
    xio, Sep 25, 2005 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.