1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Saudi woman arrested for witchcraft by "religious police" sentenced to death

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by stOx, Oct 11, 2008.

  1. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #61
    She was convicted of causing impotence through magic. So unless she caused his impotence, Specifically through magic, This is nothing but an utter injustice. For her to be guilty it must be possible to cause impotence through magic, Not the suggestion of magic, Specifically through, And directly as a result of, magic powers.

    if she was convicted of "causing impotence" (where the method used isn't important) it may be possible that she may have dirrectly or indirectly caused his impotence. But that isn't the case.
     
    stOx, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  2. homebizseo

    homebizseo Peon

    Messages:
    4,538
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #62
    I said that I did not think, I did not say that it was not possible. Just because I think its not possible does not make it a fact. I know that some self proclaimed witches mix herbs together that can make people like zombies from TTX poisoning. Some people in the middle east mix poppy, marijuana and other substance together to poison people. You have listed one article and are now preaching about it. You do not know the facts of the case. Black magic cults exist throughout the middle east.
     
    homebizseo, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  3. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #63
    If she poisoned a man she should be tried for that. That isn't what she was tried and convicted of though, And you know it.

    I'm having a hard time understanding how you could support the execution of a woman for a crime you "think" isn't physically possible to commit. How does that work?
     
    stOx, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  4. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #64
    she puffed a dust on him and he became impotent. this is possible, If he believed that she has the power. Then we can question if she threaten the man with magic.
    the guy walks in the bank with a fake gun and asks the manger if he can get him 5000 dollars.
    can we convict the man of robbery since he did not threaten the bank manager and did not have a gun.
     
    pizzaman, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  5. homebizseo

    homebizseo Peon

    Messages:
    4,538
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #65
    Can you provide more sources? You have sparked my interest today.
     
    homebizseo, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  6. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #66
    me too. i can have fun with this.
     
    pizzaman, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  7. damian.hoffman

    damian.hoffman Peon

    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #67
    I'm willing to say it. I've had a witch curse me with ED, so I know it can happen. Luckily, I was able to go to my local shaman and get a powerful talisman to break her awful curse. It came in the form of a little blue stone with the magic word "Pfizer" engraved in it...

    :D
     
    damian.hoffman, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  8. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #68
    It was you who brought up the claim that "Some people in the middle east mix poppy, marijuana and other substance together to poison people". I'm saying that if she did poison him she should be tried for poisoning him, Not possessing magic powers.

    My point remains that magic powers don't exist and the conviction for the crime of possessing magic powers is a travesty of justice.

    I don't think you understand how the legal system works. When you are on trial for something you have to have done specifically what the charge states. If you are charged with possessing magical powers and you are convicted you actually have to possess magic powers. Not think you have magic powers, Not convince someone you have magic powers, You actually have to possess magic powers.

    If she poisoned a man she should be tried for poisoning him. If she took advantage of a man with inferior intellect then she should be tried for mental abuse. If she is convicted of possessing magical powers it has to be shown that possessing magical powers it at least possible, let alone shown that she actually possesses them.

    the thread boils down to two points.
    1. Is it possible to actually possess magic powers?
    2. If not, How can a conviction for possessing magic powers be a safe, lawful, just conviction?
     
    stOx, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  9. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #69
    what is magic powers? you have to see what is the definition of "magic power" in their law.
    first question is that did she cause the man's impotence and the answer could be yes.
    the second question is what is the definition of magic.
     
    pizzaman, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  10. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #70
    Part of the problem is that they have failed to define what they mean by "witchcraft". If it means "poisoning" then she is guilty of a crime, The crime of poisoning, if it means what we understand it to mean, Yourself included, It would be the possession and use of supernatural powers.

    All you are trying to do now is render productive dialogue redundant through obfuscation.
     
    stOx, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  11. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #71
    Just give the guy floppy dicked guy some Viagra, problem solved.

    Anyone advocating witching trials is a lunatic, seriously.
     
    Toopac, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  12. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #72
    There are a lot of crimes in the west that has to do with power of persuasion.
    what is the difference?
    you can not justify your position and trying to blame me for pointing it out.
     
    pizzaman, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  13. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #73
    If i tell someone that i have summoned a horde of aliens to hunt them down and get money out of them i would be tried and convicted for obtaining money through deception, Not for being an "alien summoner". She was tried and convicted for having and using magical powers, Not for tricking someone into thinking she did, Not for poisoning someone, not for taking advantage of a mentally defective man. It was for having magic powers.

    I agree.
     
    stOx, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  14. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #74
    did she say she has magical powers?
    can you stick to the actual crime rather than talking about aliens and things. there is no aliens involved. Try to stick to the facts and issues as we know it.
     
    pizzaman, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  15. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #75
    It doesn't matter what she said, The courts found her guilty of causing a mans impotence "with her sorcery".

    Are you going to challenge the definition of both "witchcraft" and "sorcery" now? Keep digging, we can still see you :rolleyes:
     
    stOx, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  16. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #76
    yes it does. if she claimed to be one and he became impotent as the result of the curse put on him, then she might be knowingly breaking the law of her country. just because you don't agree with it it does not change anything. The only definition that matters is in their law.
     
    pizzaman, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  17. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #77


    Key quotes;)

    Without a fair trial there is no point advancing the rights/wrongs, justice fell at the first hurdle (whether you believe in witches, potions & spells or not)
     
    Toopac, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  18. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #78
    So you are saying that she could possibly have caused impotence through magic? I have to press for an answer to this.
     
    stOx, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  19. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #79
    I think she might have caused the man's impotence by suggesting to be one and putting a curse on him.
    and this makes her one in the saudi arabian law.
     
    pizzaman, Oct 14, 2008 IP
  20. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #80
    Is that what you "think" may have happened? Fair enough.. off with her head! :rolleyes:

    The fact remains, She was tried and convicted of being a witch and causing impotence through magic after accusations of sorcery. If you don't think she could actually be guilty of those specific charges you should, morally, be opposed to the conviction, Let alone the sentence of beheading.
     
    stOx, Oct 14, 2008 IP