lol, ok you must be this Joe Six pack she keeps talking about robjones. I was gonna watch and let you guys dance around a bit before I point this out but ah what the hell.... Let's be clear.... all she had to do was hold her own (in perception not the debate but I'll get to that). And she only held her own because no one checked her. - Joe didn't go after her because he was trained not to. - The moderator just sat there when she said she wasn't going to answer the questions like they wanted her to. And she proceeded to do so. She would be asked a question and say something like "well I'm still on the tax thing" and just go off on what she was prepped to say. But I'll let you guys have a moment to breathe a sigh of relief because she didn't fall on her face like she could have Enjoy.... for now. LOL ok enough is enough. If one more of you jokers trys to call her smart again I'm gonna have to sick my dog youtube on you..... But to answer your question directly, can you point out what he said wrong tonight?
Awww... ok, I apologize for poking a hole in your BS about her not understanding American history when the VP on the other side couldnt even get a passing grade on it based on his televised quotes. Find an argument that holds water and maybe you won't get your nose rubbed in your failure to observe the facts..
Ok understood. So you want to go gaf for gaf? There is no hole to poke. When we were posting video of her "understanding of American history" all week you didn't have anything to say that explained any of it.
OK junior... you brought up the understanding of history as a test... apparently that's a big factor for the VP in your eyes. Explain how Biden thought FDR was the President when the market carshed in '29, and thought he communicated by a medium that didnt exist in '29... but he's a great VP candidate. By your OWN test he's a loser... but you suddenly think understanding history means nothing? You're a perfect example of someone that makes an argument then fails to support it when they realize it isnt gonna work. Grow a little integrity and either support Bidens illiteracy with regard to history or admit the argument is a failure. Otherwise, you have ZERO credibility, and Palin comes out well ahead of you on IQ.
You keep repeating that one so let's call it what it was. a gaf. He was running at the mouth and like Biden is known for and he got a year mixed up. So umm..... he was wrong right? Ok great so what you expect me to believe is that you want to compare Biden's gafs to Palin's pure unadulterated incompetence? CHALLENGE: I challenge you to go find evidence of one. JUST ONE instance where either Obama OR Biden was asked a question and they looked EVEN REMOTELY as lost and confused as Palin in her interviews. I'm not talking about gafs I'm talking about pure incoherent babbling. I mean she looked like a complete idiot and it was OBVIOUS she didn't know what she was talking about. Show me one of those please. I'll wait....
Sorry sonny... YOU raised the issue that an understanding of history was important for a VP candidate... so please quit dodging the subject YOU raised. What do you think? Is your candiadate for VP totally incapable of understanding history or is it less important that you suggested? Those are your only two choices... he has already publicly proved he doesnt have a fucking clue one the topic YOU say is so important. YOU raised the issue. Simple offer: Answer the question YOU raised or else you are proved to be an ignorant ass. Pick one.
One gaf means he doesn't "have a fucking clue". You're getting pretty angry. But please know that if you're trying to compare that ONE 1929 gaf to Palin's idiocy... well... people are laughing at you right now. I mean dude.... you just said Joe Biden doesn't have a clue on U.S. history as you compared him to Sarah Palin.... Am I missing something here? *CRICKETS* Oh yeah, and let me answer that directly before you say something stupid. YES. I think Senator Joe Biden with 26 years in the senate has VASTLY more understanding of U.S. history than Sarah Palin. And I can prove it. What say you?
Georgie - You're trying to avoid the question. YOU raised the point about an understanding of history being an issue. Do you believe FDR was president when the market crashed in 29? Do you believe TV was the medium FDR used to calm people whe he addreseesed then durnig a point whe he wasnt even in office and the medium didnt exist? You dont get to say " oh, that was just a gaffe". Answer the fucking question. It's YOUR topic. Discuss it or admit you were wrong.