I use the html affiliate links from CJ. I make three changes to them. 1) Add custom SID to track source of sale down to link clicked In some cases, I think I exceeded the 15 character limit but stick to letters and numbers. 2) Add rel="nofollow" to prevent losing too much PR juice to affiliate links 3) Add alt=" " to the image tracking code so my site passes the html validator test --- Here's a sample "before and after" of my changes: Before: <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-2914285-10273706?sid=CLTurbo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zappos.com%2Fn%2Fredirect.cgi%3Fq%3Dvz348348341z2%26zcj%3D1&cjsku=7446048106" target="_blank"> Chinese Laundry Test</a> <img src="http://www.lduhtrp.net/image-2914285-10273706" width="1" height="1" border="0"/> After: <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-2914285-10273706?sid=CLTurbo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.zappos.com%2Fn%2Fredirect.cgi%3Fq%3Dvz348348341z2%26zcj%3D1&cjsku=7446048106" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> Chinese Laundry Test</a> <img src="http://www.lduhtrp.net/image-2914285-10273706" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt=" " /> Can anyone tell me of these changes would prevent my affiliate links from performing properly? How can I test that the modified affiliate links work without having to actually purchase a product from my site each time? Do I have to redo all my custom SIDs that may exceed 15 characters since they may be hurting my affiliate link performance or does CJ just truncate them in the reports? Thanks George
If CJ have a 15 char limit on their SID, then you should stick to it (I rarely use CJ SIDs so I don't know). Other than that, it all looks fine. Some of us don't even bother with the tracking pixel image You can test your link by examining your cookies using the standard link, and then testing again using your modified link. Firefox : Tools > Options > Privacy > Show Cookies. If you get the same cookies both times, then it should be all ok.
Hi Kerosene, That's a great idea. I took you up on that and actually entered the cookie values for both the original and modified links. I've attached a file with the results. Please let me know if this comparison proves that there should be no difference in the two affiliate links. I just altered my domain name to a generic one (mysitesname.com). Thanks Very Much George