Sad Day for America (Majority of Republican Presidential Candidates Support Torture)

Here's your Hollywood Mr. Tancredo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ7auLWUWdk

Have the terrorists killed the enlightenment? Should we behead the captives in Guantanamo Bay on TV, fair is fair right? They would do it to us right?

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1125696

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Convention_Against_Torture

 

You have something in common with gworld!

He also started a post in support of terrorists entitled Sad Day for America, to seek sympathy and support for an al qaida terrorist.

Even though your post is dishonest, if it were true, it would be a sad day for terrorists. But, some people have a soft spot for people that want to kill them. How about you, briant?

 

I have a soft spot for the Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme.

I would have put it in English, but I didn't know if you'd understand it--so I'm tried a different approach.

 

Why not preach your views to terrorists? Seems like they would benefit from them, wouldn't you think?

 

the us tries to act like the moral police and then plays dirtier than the enemies they are fighting.. how american
no wonder I'm planning on voting democrat

 

Oh for Christs sake, we all know McCain is the only good choice since Gulio is more insane, RP killed himself, and Romney is a freak.

Greaaaaat plan, and then after we declare it the USSA you'll bitch about the mandatory cameras in every house that Shrillobamawhore will have installed.

 

Would you give up your human rights so a terrorist can have theirs? i'm just wondering if you prefer human rights or terrorists.

 

As long as their torturing the right people.

The big question is what exactly is your definition of torture? Are you okay with sleep deprivation, environmental changes, mental games? We do have to have some leverage in interrogations.

 

But only 1 acts like an abused wife and that's Ron Paul. Whereas at least half the democratic field acts like an abused wife.

We deserved to be attacked. We deserved it. Sorry, we won't do it again.

Briant is mad because terrorists aren't getting fully inflated balls to play with

 

The threat of torture almost always yields better results than the torture itself does.

 

I've often wondered what makes an irrational person think the way he does. It's not just him, but a generation of people that seem to have this submissive notion that they are to blame for everything. Pessimism is their high. Blame America first is their cause.

For me, it seems like an abuse issue. As if they were abused as children. Not just physically, but verbally. Parents that tell them they are no good, telling them they are worthless, that all the parent's problems are the fault of the child. The child grows into an adult with a low self-esteem and learns that he can get attention from others by whining about anything (real or imagined) and feels the need to take the blame (either personally or on behalf of an associative group, or in this case, their country) for everything.

It's really sad. There's no doubt in my mind that people like this didn't get the home training they deserved. I encourage parents to spend more time with their children. Give them positive reinforcement, tell them they are doing good and encourage them to perform beyond expectations.

 

Spirit walker More like spirit drinker

 

http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm

The US is a signatory FWIW

 

Since when did you know of terrorists or any other type of insurgency adhering to the Geneva Convention? This an asinine relation to battlefield combatants.

 

No that's you, i don't worry every single minute of day if terrorists (our enemies) are getting a fair shake. A person must be a pretty disturbed or pathetic to worry about such things.

 

Geez, is that the best you could come up with?

 

This was the illogic I had to respond to. Give up my human rights for the terrorists The administration wants to take the people's rights so they can "protect" them.

And, "i'm just wondering if you prefer human rights or terrorists," just makes no sense.

 

They can name anyone an enemy combatant as I've already told you. And how many of those people in Gitmo are being charged with any crime?

 

Yes that's right! i've been worrying for ages now that many innocent people around me may be taken there, i'm reallly concerned about my local News agent, Milkman & doctor not to mention my mother!

Not really, you always moan about human rights but that issue always involves terrorists too, so i was wondering with which your most concerned with human rights or just terrorists?

 

The question as posed made sense to me, but you failed to provide an answer to it and rather chose to comment on the user title applied by the forum.

Whos rights is the administration trying to take away and which rights might those be exactly?