Show us some policies where RP is directly racist. Show us his membership card to a racist group, show us something more than a couple quotes from years and years of publications. Huck has tons of stuff on him, yet for you the debunked 'truth squad' is the fact, even when Fox stated it's far from fact. Who is trully not accepting the 'obvious?'
Don't even try to use Walter Williams to cover up for Ron Pauls racist newsletter. I spend a lot more time on the ron paul forums that most of you guys do. Hey, how about the picture of a Jew "hanging" in his office? That would be good to cover up his racist newsletter. Don't make me do your work for you. I know the games well.
What, no one's going to address the newsletter and ron paul ACTUALLY defending it, but also his campaign manger defending it? Are we going to deflect again? Ooooh, where are the real men when you need them?
lol it's really not too obvious. guerilla states that he's debunked it before.. i'm sure if we wanted we could drag that all up again in this thread. but i'm sure in the end we could all admit it would be a great waste of time. to be honest i don't know the full story on it. if that was true and serious, it would've stopped him in his steps. i can tell you one thing though, i can tell you like to manipulate voters just like the liberals do by making one race feel like it's the victim... hmm it kinda reminds me of the blowback foreign policy we have in America! at the end of the day they just feel used anyway.
Come on boys, you're all here to cover up your boy's racism, yet it's staring you right in the face and you don't want to acknowledge it? Grim, do you believe blacks are incapable of making good political decisions too? Is that why you overlook it? Come on son, be a man! Step up to the plate!
He hasn't earned the right to be under media scrutiny yet, Nate. He's a bottom tier candidate with six months of holding at 5% in the polls. Stop deflecting. You see the words, you know they are offensive and "we" both know why. We see him defending such as well as his campaign manager. In other words, the words were acceptable to them, they gave reasons why they were, and defended them. What more does it take? Janet Jackson's breast couldn't be more revealing!
ahahha, you're acting like i'm trying to avoid what you're saying.. not really the case. why don't you shed light on what guerilla said? it's not too "fair and balanced" to only present one side of the story. i guess that's the difference between me and you.
Let's go, boyz! All you ron paul guys sitting around with that "deer in the headlights" look, PMing each other back and forth on strategy. Just one lil' ol' GTech here! What? Ya gonna "lynch" me? hehe!
You have brought this same thing up over and over Gtech. Talk about beating a dead horse. Show us something where he is a member of a racist group, where his policies are racist, something that actually shows a racist mentality. A couple of quotes over years of writings surely is not racist one bit. Hell even at face value, no I do not take it as racist one bit. Worded badly yes, racist NO not even close! That is if he even wrote it, either way to me it doesn't even come close to him being racist..
Actually I'm laughing at you if anything. You've brought this same crap up over and over, it's a bit ridiculous that you have nothing better to hang onto.
Nate, I presented your candidate's story. Source, followed by your candidate's defense of said story. How much fairer could it be? I'm not worried about Guerilla. He's scrambling to figure out how to cover up the fact that HIS candidate has actually defended and justified his racist comments, as well as his campaign manager at the time. There's no cover it up. Ron Paul wrote the letter, it's been an issue in the past, and he's defended his own words. What better evidence could I present, than the evidence from the very mouth of your own candidate?
yea i acknowledged your source. aren't you comfortable with seeing another side to the story? if you were so confident you wouldn't need to avoid guerilla's previous comments.
Come on grim, unleash that narcissism! I know you won't address your candidate's racism or his actual documented defending of it. Nope, you won't go there, not man enough. The gym doesn't teach that! Whose going to be man enough to stand up and say "ok, GTech, we see his racist newsletter, and we see the solid proof you've presented showing our candidate actually admitting to it, and defending it. And guess what, we don't care that he's a racist? Will it be you, grim? How about guerilla? I know guerilla doesn't care, because in the early days, he actually defending it too, saying they were reasonable comments! How about you, Nate? Doesn't it bother you that ron paul thinks black people don't have enough common sense to make good political decisions? Huh? Whose going to be the man? Step, claim your manhood right now! HUGE PENIS CONTEST! (that ought to get grim out of the closet!)
Thank about that, Nate! It's YOUR candidate's words! What "other" side of the story? What...s Alex Jones going to chime in and say "hey, you know, we've heard from ron paul, but we really need to hear from ron paul to get his take on ron paul's comments"
o man you are too much lmao! like i said, show me the other "solid proofs" and i'll evaluate it. not that hard.
I take the quotes as not being a pussy and actually trying to tackle the issue head on. In your logic if there is a problem in a minority segment, you can not bring it up without fear of being called a racist. Hell if there is a health crisis that only one race can have 'some races do have higher chances of certain diseases' according to you they should not bring it up, as it' 'racist' Even in these quotes it's not calling for death and destruction, it's simply bringing up points. Nothing racist about it in my eyes. Hell alot of blacks have said the same thing or worse, but I'm sure they are racist against their own race? Just as in your eyes admitting to problems caused by our involvement overseas is 'tearing down America' you'd rather we stay blind folded at all times. Sorry but your beating of the dead horse has back fired. Get back to me when you have something actually racist, something showing him supporting racism, his policies etc. Until then I support him even more, I can give respect to a guy who tackles issues w/o pandering, you know unlike your boy Huck
Gtech stop the crap, you simply are unreal. Not man enough, please Gtech I'm more man than you could ever hope to be. You are pathetic and that's about it, you should have stayed banned. All you do is post hateful lie filled crap, you IMHO are one of the worst excuses for a human being on this forum.
You have it STRAIGHT from your candidate's mouth? WTF more can be solid proof, than coming from his OWN mouth? What, now ron paul is a liar? Is he dishonest? Did he write it, defend it, then not write it and not defend it? Nate...take off the tinfoil hat and start using your thinking cap. (Gee, wonder where I just saw that?) Come on boyz! You're trying to think, but nothing happens!