Something I've noticed about people that bitch about Fox News; they've never watched Fox News. Something I've noticed about people who watch Fox News; they think for themselves.
thats not exactly what happened is it now? LOL you are trying to make it sound like you did nothing at all? LOOOOOL necessity? LOL...the whole world hates you because you are such good good guys ...osama hates you just because the saudis sold oil to you! LOL you hate the truth dont you?
what, are you going to tell us your undocumented version of history? You know, the one where you fire off some wild story with no quotes or historical backing? In all your time here, I think you've only provided an outside reference to any of your babbling once, and it was completely unrelated to what you were claiming. Go ahead. Spin away. Provide evidence. It would be a nice change to the manic laughter. Terrific! Now you speak for the whole world, much of which coincidentally, is still trying to get into the US! Even your twisted hatred of the US is hard to understand. Are you really that pissed off about not being able to kill your neighbors and countrymen?
The whole issue is of Pakistani nukes falling into terrorist hands. If they could attack a naval base, how secure is any Pakistani nuclear base? And how much of Pakistan's military has been infiltrated by Al-Qaeda?
no your explanation sounds perfectly reasonable...saudi sells oil to USA and osama blows up US embassy in rage...makes perfect sense i can envision osamas rage when he found out LOL ... "what!!!!! saudis sell oil to my former allies? F U C K im so pissed!!!!!!!!!!!" then the only logical next step was to blow up the US embassy because oil is so hard to come by in saudi arabia no its all sounds perfectly reasonable to obaamanation LOL you need help bro...lots of it...
Not my theory. Its those pesky history books, independent journalists, investigative reporters, video taped interviews, etc. Still, maybe we should go with your opinion.....
speculate it is okay, such that the predicted by Ron Paul. but whether it will happen? we also do not know. hopefully this problem can be resolved by peaceful means and no violation of law and human rights.
I don't agree. This video originally aired on CSPAN, House Session (4/24/2002). [video=youtube;DoLML6OoUtg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoLML6OoUtg[/video]
"The Dangerous Period of Chaos" (Paul) - What is your point billion, the dangerous Republican Agenda and eventual economic collapse was well known and predicted by many. What then motivates Paul to run as a Republican candidate...????? Moving even further to the Right is his solution?
If it was predicted by many, why did it continue the same way? Where did they hide? Why didn't they stand up? The fact he is consistent motivates it. Not flip flopping like most of the others who now use his language in debates. He is not driven by popularity. He want to solve the problem. I'm sure people will soon say that the solution Ron Paul present was the only solution and that many said so...
Ron Paul: If US invades Iraq, it will trigger biggest war since World war II - didn't happen. Ron Paul: Civil War will erupt in US following govt's misuse of Patriot act - didn't happen Ron Paul: India, Pakistan, Russia will grab the chance in chaos to expand in central Asia - didn't happen Ron Paul: In short, everything is doom and gloom - Guess what, didn't happen.
The Bush Administration and Republican Congressional Delegation were the sole proponets of the invasion of Iraqi and administered their agenda under a false pretext of WMD and succeeded through legislative enactments. They likewise are responsible for the resultant Recession. There really is not a corollary to Paul's opposition in the video and what he represents as a candidate, his opposition in the past is not an endorsement of a Liberal philosophy or an original agenda but a criticism within the Policies and Principles of the Republican Establishment in order to endorse an even more radical itinerary that would lead to even greater discourse than the discourse he was in objection to. The opposition to the Republican agenda resulted in the present Obama Administration and both houses of Congress in 08 being a Democratic majority - Paul and the 2010 election represent a return to conditions that led to the economic turmoil the country presently is in need of resolution for and Paul's candidacy as a Republican only endorses his complicity to the existent conditions than a solution for them.
1. The point is that a lot of the things he said did happen. What did the other presidential candidates talk about at that time? 2. Which is the biggest war since WW II? What other wars are related to the Iraq invasion? 3. Time has not ended yet. The wars are still ongoing.
1. Just like any pity astrologer, if I am to make 20 random predictions, odds are I'm gonna get 5 of those right.. And few things that he said were no-brainer at all. 2. Most expensive war since world war II, yeah.. But not the way RP implied it. Comparing any war with WWII means a war on global scale. Iraq invasion is not even close by long shot. 3. Yeah time not ended yet and it will never end. So..... Let wait for Ron Paul's predictions to come true in like what, next 2000 years? That's how mr. Nostradamus Paul rolls, right? Mate, his predictions are same as anyone predicting that everyone alive today will be dead in future.
1. True. You probably would guess 5 out of 20. 2. How do you know? 3. The war is still going on. Normally wars end before you say how big they're. Puh..useless. What point is there to discuss. If you can't see the difference I'm unable to convince you.
I'm sure Bernanke and the other big bosses agree with you(see video below). There are many polls. I'm truly sad that you can't see what Ron Paul stands for. [video=youtube;4u4lBRdPSMc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u4lBRdPSMc[/video]