Yes. Let's keep doing the same thing we've always been doing. Elect the same people and parties. They've done a great job so far. Cause if you keep doing the same thing over and over, you should get different results. Is that right? I thought THAT was the definition of crazy.
You're missing one key element. Hillary was not Black. Not exactly how I remember it. He was a member of the movement, and a revolution, not the establishment. Why do you think he got pushed out of the Speaker position? He was never a lobbyist. He was a consultant. He certainly did not need the money either. Trying to tie paid consulting work Newt did for Freddie as the cause of the housing market collapse is so far from reality it defies even the most befuddled of logic. Besides, Bachmann's the only one making that claim. And she is doing it cause her former campaign organizer said it would be a good idea to help derail any comments that Newt might make with regards to Bachmann's ability to do anything other than be a cover girl for why botox is bad. He increased his net worth by writing over a dozen best selling books. I'd suggest picking up one of them and reading them. No, there is no one more in tune with history than Newt. Newt's the complete opposite of DC. Again, it's the reason he's not there anymore. About the only accurate thing you've said here. (I placed it in Bold so you'd know what it was) The Hitler analogy is cute.
Nope, expecting the same results as 1994, which got us the surplus btw!!!! History. How's the weather in St. Louis btw? I'm originally from Webster Groves!
I'm in Des Peres actually. Cold but sunny blue skies. Where are you now? Where did you go to high school?
Oh. Then you don't get the inside joke. Traditionally St. Louisans, when they meet each other, ask that question. Three of the actors on "The Office", and one writer, are from St. Louis and when "Erin" (Ellie Kemper) joined, it was the first question she asked "Phyllis" and "Pam".
Not familiar with the show. But I have had people legitimately ask what HS I attended... Anyway, you start saying things like Kirkwood, Crestwood, Webster, Shrewsbury, Clayton, Erie, etc.. people know.
You are believing the P.R. Obama had been groomed for the Presidency since Ted Kennedy got Obama to give the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic convention. An unknown doesn't get the keynote address - it's a position used for party promotion. Obama's campaign had enormous backing and money. OTOH, Hillary Clinton had an enormous organization outside of the Democratic Party's power base. By that I mean she had her own sources of funding that did not require the Party's machinery. I never said he wasn't. But you have to ask why both parties wanted him shoved him out of the Speaker's chair. Depends on your definition of radical. I don't like all of Ron Paul's positions, and I'm not sure at this time if he would be a good President. I *do* like that he is making both parties uncomfortable. You have to give some cred to a candidate that makes both parties uncomfortable. Look, it takes over $500M to get elected President. If you get that money through the Party machinery that money comes with strings and a leash. For Obama, he is Wall Street's bitch and the obedient servant of the oil companies. Despite what liberals like to think of Obama, if a Republican had done exactly what Obama has done, wouldn't the Dems be calling for his impeachment?
LOL. In your opinion Ron Paul should not be president because he will not scarifies USA in the interest of Israel. He is traitor because he is a patriot and put the interest of his country before Israel. New Pledge of Allegiance according to you and other neo-cons: I pledge allegiance to the flag of Israel over the United States of America, and to the Zionism for which it stands, one nation under Jewish God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all (pro-Israel) Jews and some Americans.
Ah, I was wondering when the anti-semite personality was going to arrive.. Now all of Gworld's various personalities are here, except the anti-Romanian one.. He's probably saving that one for when his routine expulsion is no doubt eminent.
So mentioning that a president of a country should act to protect his own country interests is anti-Semite? Isn´t this the definition of being a patriot? The neo-cons trained so many Americans so well during last 20 years that they don´t even realize that they are traitors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason may be neo-cons can also change the oath of office for the President: ´I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the representative office of Israel as President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the interest of Israel.´
I never visit these threads but I understand gworld's point about support for Israel. I've often wondered about this.
Julian is not interested in making a point. His only ambition is to make fun of anything and everything and in doing so; make an ass out of himself. Really Julian. You know this is not about a president or your hatred of Israel. It's about attacking me. You get off on it, I get that. As I have indicated countless times in the past, if it makes you happy - I'm perfectly fine with it. However please attempt to do it in private. You're wasting everyone else' time by doing it in a public forum. Besides taking us dangerously off topic, you're alienating everyone here in the process. Now you're just being silly. No one here is interested in your closed minded shallow beliefs, lack of tolerance for religion, creed, race or sexual preference. You're a pitiful, hateful sad little shrimp of a man. Maybe it might be time to just go away before you get publicly spanked and banned permanently.
It seems other members are interested in my opinion and even may be agree with it and the only person who is upset is our local transvestite who is posting the usual hissy fit rants. By the way did you notice that you didn´t answer even one of my points in your hissy fit state and you only posted the same rants as always?
You got it. I do. It wasn't used in the context of the hate I would use for say, Hitler, etc. It was just a point about extreme disapproval the same way I use when I describe rival sports teams. It's just a different variant of the word.
Rofl Mao hehehe lol That bold made my day and I don't even know what all they've said before. I just know forums and there's always some people that hate on different things.
Julian, you've only made one point, and that point is abundantly clear. You're not interested in engaging in an intelligent conversation that remains on topic. You're only interest is in attacking me. In so doing you stand to spend most of 2012 where you were last year; in a time out. Sun, he's carrying on several different attacks in several different threads. It's basically one conversation, mixed into multiple threads.
Believe me that I wish from bottom of my heart that you had the intelligence to engage in an intelligent conversation but as it is I have to only amuse myself by laughing at you.