Not a new twist. The truth. Press.TV is state funded, but has editorial independence. A little bit of research is not too much to ask. You can do much better GTech. Mark Levine is a super-critical Ron Paul opponent. And guess what? He works for Press.TV
Continued denial, even when proven otherwise. No worries though, you've made clear of your support for Iran in the past. This is just another example. Everyone's best interest, but he country one is living in.
What I've gotten out of this thread... Some feel foreign nations, foreign press, etc should decide who we elect either by support for, or simply because those who supposedly support a candidate are not ones we like. Sure appears to me that an 'evil' country is not dumb, an 'evil' country would know that if they endorse a certain candidate it would hurt that candidate. Using this logic they would endorse the guy they do not want to run.. Good to see some feel endorsements from foreign sources should determine who we vote for... yawn, these threads are getting extremely boring as of late. The same old thing over and over........
Seems like absence of proof and fact has been the problem with your contention. I definitely support the moderate reform movement, that helped us in Afghanistan by providing intel on the Taliban, and that lobbied the N.A. to accept Karzai (our choice) to lead the new Afghanistan. I also support the fatwa against nuclear proliferation by the Ayatollah and attempts to normalize relations with the U.S. I think these have been progressive moves in the right direction. Unfortunately, when the reformers were coming up on election, a certain President labeled them the Axis of Evil, which whipped up national sentiment against America, and brought in the fool Ahmadinejad. Only a simple minded person would think that nations, policy and politicians are perfectly good, or perfectly evil. A person with poor moral fiber would wish against peace, and brush away olive branches, no matter how small or insignificant. War is not a goal, or a solution. Peace is both.
What I've noticed in this thread .... A number of terrorist organizations have endorsed a candidate who is extremely critical of Israel and Israel only, and has a historical archive of racist newsletters that are vile with contempt and hatred for Blacks, Jews and Homosexuals. Sure appears to me that this "evil country" who wants a candidate that agrees with their positions and has made clear he would not interfere with that "evil country" destroying Israel or attacking the US, knows exactly why they are supporting him. Using historical logic, it's no wonder they support Ron Paul. It's good to see who terrorist states AND organizations support. They know a good deal when they see one. It's also refreshing to see those who also support these terrorist organizations (Iran and Hamas) show their appreciation for this unprecedented support for their candidate. Perhaps bin laden and hezbollah will be the next "foreign sources" (wouldn't want to call them what they really are here) to endorse Ron Paul.
damn i thought your mindless ramblings were bad, i really know how bad they are now! sorry what was that? your man is going broke because of ron paul nazis? lol
I think gtech will pass on that one lol. Too much fact for anyone to handle , and i have posted many times that i dont trust the american people first before the any government(that includes the iranian government) but i have also posted on how we indirectly set the stage for this current iranian government to come to power. Can you imagine what kind of country iran would be to this day had our government and the british government allowed nature to take its course and mossadegh to stay in power. they would have had maybe 20 years of peace under the leadership of a compassionate financial intellectua(he had a phd in finance). This would have made anyone furious but not some of these neocons on this thread.
You're just fooling yourself. You have extreme hate for Muslims. You are either a compulsive liar, or have no brain whatsoever. GTech's hateful post http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=5797560&postcount=121 has been completely refuted on this post http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=5801116&postcount=126 But your utter disregard for truth is astonishing. Hate is all you know. And you know what, what goes around, comes around...
Gtech who? Gtech is a nobody that thrives on inflaming people here by spreading lies, racism and hate! I've said it before and I would stake my life on it that DP is the ONLY place Gtech even gets a reaction. In real life he is simply...invisible.
And here is from your ?holy? book: And here is from the post that you say disputes that: Which he was correct, wasn't he. So not sure how it was a lie? Here we have it in print, is this not from the kkkoran?
Man, am I glad I have that fool on ignore. I'm going to bet any mention of politics or real world news will be ignored by GTech, and instead he will go on with his "rabble rabble rabble" about a racist candidate supported by a sponsor of terrorism, all while neglecting the fact that the country he supports so deeply is also a huge sponsor of terrorism. He will not address this fact, nor indicate whether he supports its actions, because he'd either have to say he doesn't support terrorist actions by his own government (which would go against his raging boner for America), or he would have to say he supports the actions of our government and its involvement with terrorist actions (and hence look like a huge hypocrite). If he attempts to dispute our involvement with terrorists and bad leaders, just bring up 1980's Saddam, the assassination of the Shah in the 1950's, support of 1980's Mujahideen, Nicaraguan Contras, among many other events. But he'll find a way to do his same old song and dance and slip around this legitimate question, which is why he's on ignore.