People always bring up the fact that Oswald was a Marine "marksman" without any idea of what they are talking about, or if they have one are just being decietful. He was a poor shot accoring to anyone who had direct knowledge of his shooting skills. The vast majorit of people who join the Army or Marine Corps end up qualifying, so yeah a guy off the street could most likely qualify. BTW, I've never seen any evidence that Oswald every shot anything at 500 yards have you? Conspiracy means someone else was involved. It sounds like they are letting the cat out of the bag one paw at a time. Now why would they say a conspiracy was likely involved and leave it at that. And on top of that, say, "We won't even release the information until 2029."
So you conceding that oswald didn't have to be a great shot to hit kennedy at the given distance? Since any dufus off the street could do it. Right? After training. http://www.theava.com/03/1203-let-conspiracy.html Targets were placed at 500 yards. I dunno if he shot anything other than that. It's besides the point. Again, if cat out of the bag means using unreliable evidence. You have a good point. And you keep making it; for some reason. So, Briant, are you proud that you and st0x have the same candidate choice?
You are wasting your time arguing with these fools stOx. You are dealing with the worse kind of sheeple here, trust me I have been doing battle with these tools for months now. Not only are they completely brainwashed by the controlled mainstream media they actually resolutely defend terrorists like Bush, Cheney and the rest of the corrupt neocon arseholes, which makes their actions despicable, even in a poxy webmaster forum. These idiots think I am anti-American even though I keep telling them I am anti-American administration, because it is the corruption within the American administration that will ruin the world if it continually goes unchecked as it is doing at the moment. I'm hoping people wake up before it's too late. Progress is being made, peeps are slowly starting to figure out the BS that FOX News and the rest of the moronic mainstream news channels feed out to the sheeple on an hourly basis but as I said, it's a slow realisation, partly due to the fact that more morons are worried about that slut Hilton doing her time in jail than the unwinnable "war" in eye rack.
I said barely qualifying on the Marine Corps firing range could be done by most guys off the street. The problem with Oswald is that he would have had to hit a moving target, which wasn't a problem on the firing range, which he barely qualified on.
That's a yes from AGS. He finds a friend in someone who supports Hamas, thinks Israel shouldn't defend itself, thinks its okay when terrorists blow up civilians in Iraq, and kill Americans in general. Why am I not surprised?
So, now he's down from marksman to not being able to fire a gun? Seriously, Briant, why are you mis-stating his record and lying about it? A target that was moving on a virtual straight line away from him. It's not difficult, especially at the distance required. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Harvey_Oswald http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharpshooter Read and learn a little Briant.
Stop talking nonsense lorien, why do you think I dispise Bush as much as I do? He knew about 9/11 before it happened and he's a scumbag. Yet you still keep defending him. Just like the Iraqi Government he's a complete puppet, but he's still complicit.
He knew or he caused it, AGS? Have you read st0x's posts to see who you are supporting and agreeing with?
First you try to tell me I don't know what "beggin the question" means, now I can't read. So you're reduced to the old "ad hominem" And speaking of reading, it clearly states that in 1959 he barely qualified. FYI, marksman is the lowest qualification, and he got one point more than the minimum to qualify.
The penis can barely tie his own shoelaces lorien, but as I said he was complicit in it all the same. Very clever people are controlling your chump hero. It all boils down to that one question: Who benifits? Who gains the most from this fake war on terror? You do the math.
So telling you to learn and read is an ad hominem attack. Interesting. I understand what marksman means. Again; keep in mind that this for varying ranges. If he was good at hitting close targets (say 80 yards) but shitty at 500 yards, he wouldn't score well, would he? I've seen his shooting record someplace online, but I can't find it now. You are avoiding every point I bring up; simply chanting the same old thing at me. He was trained 500 yards. 80 yards was the distance to JFK - much easier, yes?. He missed with a bullet or two. He wasn't perfect. He didn't need to be. Does that sum it up for you? Are you reading any of the supporting information I link to? http://www.ranum.com/fun/bsu/diy-dealy/index.html I'm really giving you chances here Briant, but clearly you aren't interested in separating fact from fiction.
So that is still a yes, AGS thinks st0x is correct in each of his major points. Thanks for that again, AGS. I'm still not surprised.
AGS is always there with a comforting word for those that defend evil: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site:forums.digitalpoint.com+AGS+wasting&btnG=Search Right, because AGS lets alex jones do his thinking for him. Therefore, AGS believes he's smarter than the average folk, because he has inside lizardoid secrets from alex jones paid website. Most of us think you are pro-terrorist. You never have a bad word for them, you always defend them, and once again...in this thread, you are supporting terrorists by giving them aid and comfort. Absolving them of their crimes, despite the fact you have been proven wrong time and time again, and run away from the facts everytime they are presented. Most conspiracy nuts say this. That it is others who have to wake up. That they believe they have super secret inside information that they just can't make others believe in. You personify this egotistical phenomena. Straight out of the alex jones playbook.
LHO is a patsy. OBL is a patsy. Hmm. Everyone with 3 names is a patsy in AGS world. Wait. AGS has 3 letters too. Are you a patsy?
You still can't handle it can you? Your military has killed 100,000 civilians since the war started. Not 100,000 terrorists, Civilians. Not to mention raped and executed one child and her family. Id take the side of one of these so called "terrorists" over a child rapist any day. It worries me that you are unable to condemn the rape and murder of a child just to save face on a forum. I think it shows a certain amount of detachment from what is actually going on over there. It's more important to you to shout "yeehaw, USA USA!!" than to actually do the decent thing and condemn such vile atrocities.
That one's called "guilt by association." (Not that I'm calling st0x guilty). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt_by_association Since I see you're struggling with your logical fallacies (and who hasn't ), I'll help you a bit. Who knows, maybe you'll see the light http://theautonomist.com/aaphp/permanent/fallacies.php Now if you read these carefully, then go back and watch your faviorite politicians and news presenters ect., you'll may feel as if you've taken the "red pill"...and you may even find it in yourself to suppoprt Ron Paul (the original subject of this thread.)
That would be your buds doing all that. The ones you don't have a bad word for, remember? Our guys are freeing Iraqis from your bud's captivity. You need some refresher training.