I was talking to this guy who told me that he would vote for Ron Paul but everything is controlled by MSM and they pick the president which got me thinking. The Media is pretty liberal, yet they were unable to elect Gore in 2000 or Kerry in 2004. Even though they displayed/aired more negative media about Republicans and Bush by a 2-1 margin when compared to democrats So maybe they can't elect who they want. What else I know about the MSM is that for a lack of a better word they are a bunch of whores. They'll jump onto the bandwagon of who ever is winning hence Rudy Giuliani pre Iowa, Huckabee after Iowa and so on. So the Question comes down to why haven't they jumped onto his bandwagon, But when you poll 4% nationally your not a viable candidate. When you talk about dismantling the government, you'll always remain a 4% candidate because the American People understand reality even if they don't like it.
The American people are sheep and they are digging their own grave. You watch when the rest of the world bails on our ass, pulls their assets, investments and everything out. Just watch the stock market tomorrow.
They'll bail on us and go where exactly? Like there is another country that drives 25% of the Worlds GDP. As for the stock market two main things drive the stock market, fear and greed A year ago we were in the greed stage now where in the fear stage.
They'll go to Asia and South America. This country is already milked dry. The buy power is gone, middle class is gone, we produce shit, we consume more than we produce, we are going bankrupt, we are fucked!
Right they'll go to China which exports 21% of their goods to the country that drives the world economy and China won't feel anything from our slow down. Or they can go to Venezuela where you have 40% inflation and the threat of war with its neighbors. Which exports the majority of its oil to the US. In the end every country lives off the US so they'll wait it out like the rest of us.
Also its better to consume more then you produce because if you produce more goods then there is the demand for, it says in inventory which means that that money invested in goods sits there, there is less demand to keep people employed and less money for future investments.