I Have Two Image Hosting Sites Review: www.5starpix.com & www.fotorazor.com What do you think of the design, could I add somethign to it? Does it load fast?
FotoRazor looks significantly better than than 5Star Pix Hosting, it's clean and simple whilst 5Star looks more like something from 2002. I would say that FotoRazor could use some trimming of the fat for the footer portion of the website, keeping it to 2-3 lines is usually best. Also, the numbers describing the maximum file size are incorrect. Assuming you're using Bytes, not bits, for both, 4MB would be 4,096KB and 16MB would be 16,384KB. If you're using bits for some reason, you shouldn't be.
www.5starpix.com and www.fotorazor.com load slowly from my end.Site is enoughcool for image hosting service.
Hi, I like the site "fotorazor.com" better than I do "5starpix.com" but that's just my thoughts. Both sites load good, fotorazor seems to me to load faster than 5starpix. As for a image hosting site, I would use them both .
Fotorazor looks great, is fast and looks like a good imageshack contender. I wasn't that keen on the other design. I found the banner ads a little off putting. I imagine the Myspace crowd will like it.