Review and rate this design

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by SabTech, May 10, 2011.

?

Rate the design please (1 is worst to 10 is best)

Poll closed May 18, 2011.

  1. 1

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  2. 2

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  3. 3

    1 vote(s)
    33.3%

  4. 4

    1 vote(s)
    33.3%

  5. 5

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  6. 6

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  7. 7

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  8. 8

    1 vote(s)
    33.3%

  9. 9

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  10. 10

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
0
  1. #1
    Last edited: May 10, 2011
    SabTech, May 10, 2011 IP
  2. wafflehorse

    wafflehorse Peon

    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Hey, not a bad layout, but there's still a lot of work here. You've got too many colors going on. The logo, the nav, and the boxes on the right...it's too much. They're all competing for the viewer's attention. It's all very flat as well. Your nav is jammed with all the links to other pages and the font is not a good choice.
     
    wafflehorse, May 10, 2011 IP
  3. EvaBrown89

    EvaBrown89 Member

    Messages:
    674
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    #3
    I think, layout is quite good, but I suggest you to make some improvements. The first thing you need to change is a logo. It has too much colors and I can't understand it. Ar the right side(Options,Customized Signape, Accessories,Friendly Service etc. ) you use too many different colors. I suggest you to use just one.
     
    EvaBrown89, May 10, 2011 IP
  4. Kenb3

    Kenb3 Peon

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I think, layout is quite good, but I suggest you to make some improvements. The first thing you need to change is a logo. It has too much colors and I can't understand it. Ar the right side(Options,Customized Signape, Accessories,Friendly Service etc. ) you use too many different colors. I suggest you to use just one.
     
    Kenb3, May 11, 2011 IP