Hello, I m new to Responsive Designs or you can say I m currently Learning it, so regarding it i would love to have feedback, I know its not perfect i would like to know what it lacks, and i love doing Website Optimization, so with the feedback do tell if the page loaded quickly. Web Page link : http://www.best2know.info/
It's an interesting start, but I think more effort needs to be put into the menu and search when the screne gets narrow as that seems to fall apart quite spectacularly. Though responsive layout is simply the next evolutionary step in accessibility -- and in that department your page skipped a few genes. Serif is for print, NOT screen... the lack of resolution to render the glyphs properly causes legibility issues. The fixed metric (px) fonts also is a miserable failure on the accessibility front, since they do not auto-enlarge for large font/120dpi users like myself -- sending me for the zoom. To be frank, if a site sends me for the zoom I either end up running an Opera user.css to override the fonts (see these forums as an example of that) or I just go some other website where it's not a problem. There's a reason accessibility guidelines say use %/EM -- USE THEM. With the whitespace compression nonsense it's hard to give a serious look under the hood, though as usual with that sort of thing it appears to be an attempt to just cover up bad code. One HTML formatter later and it's the typical bloated for nothing trash I've come to expect from a turdpress template. Absolute URL's everywhere just wasting bandwidth for NOTHING, endless pointless classes for NOTHING (big tip, if every like tag inside one parent container like a UL or DIV is getting the same class, NONE of them need classes!), HTML 5 bloat (I still can't believe anyone is DUMB ENOUGH to see merit in 5)... and of course wordpress walking through a pile and smearing it all over your markup with it's endless pointless idiotic ten classes per tag ..... I lack the words in polite company. Of course you've got 38.4k of markup (should be 42.6k with proper formatting) for a mere 5.8k of plaintext and 9 content images -- quite easily 3 or even four times as much HTML as should be necessary for such a simple page... and that's WITH formatting retained. (again why I don't see the point of whitespace stripping, write leaner code instead!)