Hi to all. I am an SEO in a web design firm. Actually I have checked our competitors' projects and services they offer well compare and contrast with them I gonna say that we have a lot of advantages in the web development, multimedia and motion graphics design. Well if it happens that you need to hire a talent or you need to outsource your project, you can contact our company. Actually our brand has this uniqueness compare to the businesses who do web services. Our company firm offers service with high quality results. We also have this NDA to our client which you cannot be seen in any web service provider. To know our site just check my info. @admin of this forum, if you find my post subjective in advertising our site you can delete my post. Thanks, George
You are an optimization you say? We can know your site?!? In the web development? If you are going to offer "premium" services you may want to learn the language you are offering it in. Now, let's see if we can track down this alleged link from your info... ASSUMING you mean that 7th-media site... Inaccessible fixed width layout on a SPLASH page with inaccessible fixed metric fonts... goofy illegible web font, color contrasts below accessibility norms, what I suspect are broken CSS sprites... When the splash page is broken useless rubbish, do I dare continue on to the actual site? Of course that one would even still have a link up to some idiotic flash based site doesn't exactly inspire confidence... but let's follow the link to the "new" HTML one. (You do know splash/selection pages are on EVERY "do not" list out there, right?) Entering the actual site we have an even LESS accessible and LESS responsive page, that's a laundry list of how not to build a website. Again inaccessible font sizes, inaccessible fixed width layout (if any responsive was used in it's creation, it's not working), illegible color contrasts, some massive idiotic video banner just getting in the way, and endless elements that reek of "look what I can do in photoshop" that to be frank are not viable for web deployment if you care about people actually using the site. Pretty much I smell turdpress... is it? Why yes, look at that, with ALL the hallmarks of sleazing together some crappy off the shelf solution - basically pissing all over your own shoes. First line proudly proclaiming it being in transition from 1997 to 1998 coding practices, it develops into the typical turdpress train wreck the further one gets into the code -- what with the endless pointless scripting for nothing, static style inlined in the markup, turdpress' "Let's throw ten classes at EVERYTHING", endless pointless wrapping DIV for nothing, nothing remotely resembling a logical document structure or proper use of numbered headings, and all the other "What is this, 1997" coding practices. Hence the 29k of markup to deliver 1.79k of plaintext, two content images and two object embeds -- anywhere from three to four times as much markup as should have been used; hardly a surprise then the absolute train wreck of FIVE MEGABYTES in 116 files (NOT counting the objects)... and the minute plus pageload here due to handshaking. When the site for the company looks like that, I pity anyone DUMB ENOUGH to become a client... but let's take a look at some of the 'work'... like that OSHAManuals site. WOW, just as bad if not WORSE. Yeah, typical "designer" garbage that is ultimately useless from an accessibility point of view for anyone actually trying to visit the sites, that likely only has clients due to the ignorance of the people asking for sites. I feel bad for the clients and their obvious money pits.
Hey dude thanks for noticing the splash page. Actually we're now working on that. We're on the process of planning on what is the best way to do in the splash page. Our concern with this matter is being raised to the top level management together with the recommendation. Recommendation and suggestion 1. The SEO recommendation for this site is to redirect the splash page into the /home page by using 301 redirect in order the link juice will be passed. 2. Redesigning the splash. We're still thinking that the splash page should remain and use this as a call to action page or splash page can be used as the promotional and/or landing page. 3. Put more content and entice the audience. 4. Making the splash page to be flexible and responsive. 5. Regenerating a conventional code that will help developer and help search engine to make the site more SEO friendly. 6. Redesigning the whole website to make it more valuable to audience. Actually there are several updates that are on the process that we are about to up this month. These recommendation that we SEO has been proposing. We can't accept the fact that website needs some room for improvement. And that's why we are hired in order to criticized the simplicity and complexity of the website. The company has just hired us SEO recently that's why the website is in the process of upgrading and restructuring. So this is the reason. I know it's very awkward to tell that say that this service is nice. Actually replying to this thread that I have made which give negative impact, I take this as an opportunity to thank you for giving us a feedback. I promote our site without thinking what will be the result. Taking a risk, an apology to you. The one site you've mentioned, referring to that, I guess the developer who develops the site has no knowledge in SEO. It's difficult for a firm that a developer has no background in SEO. So the company came up with this plan, letting our web developer to go under a basics SEO training.Now the benefits of those who will choose us to develop their sites, they will be confident that their website will be more SEO friendly that will be a big help for them to be easily get indexed and ranked in the SERP. Dude, if you have recommendations that you like suggest for the improvement of our website, message me. Thanks for reading.