Get lost kid, find another forum to ruin, I'm not interested in discussing anything with you, OK ...... People like you would learn a hell of a lot more with your ears open and your big mouth shut!
Hahahahha. Man, you do make it tough. While I don't agree with Chulium's conclusions, it was a good faith effort, and he asked a good question. Why don't you answer him - what do you mean by "lies?" Don't you think answering this with concrete evidence might bolster your argument better than histrionics? Good advice. Let me make an attempt: -October 3, 2000 - Nov. 6, 2000 Personally, I don't think the President was willfully lying. I believe this was his goal - to end an era of American involvement in vaguely conceived missions with poorly defined linkage to a concrete national interest. But I think it betrays an ill-preparedness on his part, on the part of his administration, of the reality of the world he was coming into as leader of the United States, were he to win. I believe this same ill-preparedness led him into Iraq without an understanding of what lie under the surface, the cleavages that now threaten to spill to all-out civil war, and the quagmire of nation-building he once so forcefully castigated.
Try running the keyword searches without the quotes. You'd be amazed by the change in results. You can make a Google Search give you just about what ever desired result you wish. http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1570664&postcount=4 Maybe this thread should be merged... It's already been brought up before: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=169308&highlight=republican+scandal
Running the search w/out quotes is originally how this all started. As it is not near as accurate nor represents which party each is being referred to. This was quite+ a bit more extensive, detailed & complete then ones i'd found before. Furthermore the Republicans were given a repeated advantage. I'd be interested in seeing this done w/yahoo & possibly a few other 'key' phrases thrown in the mix. (it has to be complete & not bias) If anything i'd like to see if it's possible to even the results out (throw dem's in the hole) If you can even the results on a key phrase then let's see it. The Part II search results were quite staggering if you ask me.
Is your point that because one party has more results than another that they have more scandals? Or is your point that if one party has a scandal, its more likely to be reported as "(party) scandal" whereas another may be reported differently? What's the point, here?
Wow, you are really annoying. What the hell is wrong with you? Why do you keep talking about Nixon? At first I thought it was kind of funny, it now appears you're just a very troubled person. DP does have a blocking feature right? So I can block all posts by this guy? I will go look now, I'm pretty sure the blocking feature is available... EDIT: Found it! One less idiotic poster I have to waste my time on now.
Yep, I was horrified to learn that: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=hilary+clinton+has+large+testicles&btnG=Google+Search But, google serps says it's true, so it must be
Maybe my point has something to do with google or search engines in general. What would be the point you're getting at?
MUST be true: http://www.google.com/search?source...:2006-27,GGLJ:en&q="democrats+are+terrorists" http://www.google.com/search?source...006-27,GGLJ:en&q="republicans+are+terrorists" More plausible... http://www.google.com/search?source...J:2006-27,GGLJ:en&q=michael+moore+eats+babies
Like I said.. You can get just about any result you want with a google keyword search. Heck, I found all kinds of bad things about Shakira's connection the Nixon gang and Haliburton and posted it for Anythony on his own forum. Too bad he's not here to rebuke that. Either way, I ran the same exact search several days prior to his posting and found very different results. Guess we can blame it on Big Daddy!
-------------- Part III -------------- http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Scandals" - 76,900 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Scandals" - 2,830 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Scandals" - 9,020 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...d"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Fraud" - 2,940 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...d"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Fraud" - 1,040 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...d"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Fraud" - 951 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...l"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Scandal" - 96,600 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...l"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Scandal" - 2,240 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...l"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Scandal" 4,220 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...l"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republicans Scandal" - 1,350 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...l"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrats Scandal" - 450 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republicans Scandals" - 794 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrats Scandals" - 9,150 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...d"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republicans Fraud" - 122 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...d"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrats Fraud" - 579 Totals: R: 178,706 / 85.4% D: 30,480 / 14.5% -------------- Part IV -------------- http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Child Molesters" - 1,530 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...r"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Child Molster" - 488 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Pedophiles" - 2,400 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...e"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Pedophile" - 12,300 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...e"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Paedophile" - 33 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Paedophiles" - 34 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...a"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Pedophilia" - 15,300 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...a"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Republican Paedophilia" - 71 # Of Searches: 8 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Child Molesters" - 128 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...r"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Child Molester" - 26 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...r"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Child Molester" - 15 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Child Molesters" - 325 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...e"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Pedophile" - 745 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Pedophiles" - 634 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Pedophiles" - 433 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...e"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Pedophile" - 58 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...e"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Paedophile" - 1 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...e"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Paedophile" - 8 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Paedophiles" - 0 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Paedophiles" - 0 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...a"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Pedophilia" - 155 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...a"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democrat Paedophilia" - 0 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...a"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Paedophilia" - 0 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...a"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - "Democratic Pedophilia" - 186 # of Searches: 16 Totals: R: 32,156 / 92.2% D: 2,714 / 7.7%
. Again i'd like to point out these are phrase matches Also, if you believe you can 'sway' google, yahoo (or anyone) to represent anything you want.. Please do so by using a similar, complete non-biased (phrase match) selections. Lastly, again i am giving the Republicans a repeated advantage. .
------------------ Part V ------------------ Republican Corruption - http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="republican+corruption"&btnG=Google+Search - 145,000 Republicans Corruption - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Republicans+Corruption"&btnG=Search - 12,600 Republican Corruptions - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Republican+Corruptions"&btnG=Search - 67 Republicans Corruptions - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Republicans+Corruptions"&btnG=Search - 1 Corrupt Republican - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Corrupt+Republican"&btnG=Search - 71,300 Corrupt Republicans - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Corrupt+Republicans"&btnG=Search - 58,700 # of searches: 6 Democrat Corruption - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Democrat+Corruption"&btnG=Search - 66,100 Democrats Corruption - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Democrats+Corruption"&btnG=Search - 509 Democrat Corruptions - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Democrat+Corruptions"&btnG=Search - 13 Democrats Corruptions - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Democrats+Corruptions"&btnG=Search - 1 Democratic Corruption - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Democratic+Corruption"&btnG=Search - 17,600 Democratic Corruptions - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Democratic+Corruptions"&btnG=Search - 60 Corrupt Democrat - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Corrupt+Democrat"&btnG=Search - 13,400 Corrupt Democrats - http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Corrupt+Democrats"&btnG=Search - 24,900 # of searches: 8 Totals: R: 287,668 / 70.1% D: 122,583 / 29.8% Republican Corruption - http://search.yahoo.com/search?p="Republican+Corruption"&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8 - 105,000 Republicans Corruption - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...n"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 747 Republican Corruptions - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 49 Republicans Corruptions - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 2 Corrupt Republican - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...n"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 52,500 Corrupt Republicans - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 39,100 # of searches: 6 Democrat Corruption - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...n"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 55,400 Democrats Corruption - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...n"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 384 Democrat Corruptions - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 3 Democrats Corruptions - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 1 Democratic Corruption - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...n"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 2,770 Democratic Corruptions - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 97 Corrupt Democrat - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...t"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 3,190 Corrupt Democrats - http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...s"&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt - 10,600 # of searches: 8 Totals: R: 197,398 / 73.1% D: 72,445 / 26.8%
It really is too bad. I've been following these threads so I know for a fact that Anthony was attacked with just as much aggression, if not more, than what he responded with. Why is he banned but those attacking him are still here? It's disappointing. Added: JKE, what's with all the link spamming? I don't mind clicking on a few links to understand the point you're trying to make, but this is insane. The very least you could do is make the effort to write out your conclusions, then the links would have something to be relevant to. But just links? I'm embarrassed for you. I really am.
There is no conclusion to make. I've asked several times what JKE's point is, but he won't post it. The fact that words occur next to each other online for one search or another is not a good indicator of much, other than how people like to write a story.