This was spawned from a political chat on another forum. ------------ Part I -------------- http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+scandals"&btnG=Search - "Republican Scandals" - 111,000 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+scandals"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Scandals" - 21,500 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+scandals"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Scandals" - 12,500 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+fraud"&btnG=Search - "Republican Fraud" - 11,000 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+fraud"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Fraud" - 701 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+fraud"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Fraud" - 508 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+scandal"&btnG=Search - "Republican Scandal" - 190,000 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+scandal"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Scandal" - 16,400 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+scandal"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Scandal" 18,800 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republicans+scandal"&btnG=Search - "Republicans Scandal" - 21,100 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrats+scandal"&btnG=Search - "Democrats Scandal" - 215 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republicans+scandals"&btnG=Search - "Republicans Scandals" - 481 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrats+scandals"&btnG=Search - "Democrats Scandals" - 126 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="republicans+fraud"&btnG=Google+Search - "Republicans Fraud" - 94 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrats+fraud"&btnG=Search - "Democrats Fraud" - 462 Totals: R: 333,675 / 82.4% D: 71,212 / 17.5% ------------ Part II -------------- http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+child+molesters"&btnG=Search - "Republican Child Molesters" - 15,600 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+child+molester"&btnG=Search - "Republican Child Molester" - 219 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="republican+pedophiles"&btnG=Google+Search - "Republican Pedophiles" - 29,000 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+pedophile"&btnG=Search -"Republican Pedophile" - 31,400 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="republican+paedophile"&btnG=Google+Search - "Republican Paedophile" - 22 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+paedophiles"&btnG=Search - "Republican Paedophiles" - 28 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+pedophilia"&btnG=Search - "Republican Pedophilia" - 17,000 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="republican+paedophilia"&btnG=Search -"Republican Paedophilia" - 41 # Of Searches: 8 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+child+molesters"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Child Molesters" - 31 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+child+molester"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Child Molester" - 16 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+child+molester"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Child Molester" - 21 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+child+molesters"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Child Molesters" - 21 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+pedophile"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Pedophile" - 402 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+pedophiles"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Pedophiles" - 162 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+pedophiles"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Pedophiles" - 208 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+pedophile"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Pedophile" - 140 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+paedophile"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Paedophile" - 2 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+paedophile"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Paedophile" - 4 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democrat+paedophiles"&btnG=Search - "Democrat Paedophiles" - 0 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+paedophiles"&btnG=Search "Democratic Paedophiles" - 0 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="democrat+pedophilia"&btnG=Google+Search - "Democrat Pedophilia" - 12 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="democrat+paedophilia"&btnG=Google+Search - "Democrat Paedophilia" - 0 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="democratic+Paedophilia"&btnG=Search - "Democratic Paedophilia" - 0 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="democratic+Pedophilia"&btnG=Google+Search - "Democratic Pedophilia" - 14 # Of Searches: 16 Totals: R: 93,310 / 98.9% D: 1,033 / 1.0% ----------------------------------------------- So... what do we make of this?
There are two words for corruption in politics! Nixon Gang! http://dir.salon.com/story/politics/feature/2002/06/17/bush_watergate/print.html `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
You have an obsession with Nixon, don't you? JKE: You know why the numbers are so distorted? Because democrats and liberals freak out at anything a conservative or republican does even remotely wrong or the slightest mistake in some cases. It's just because they have no other way to get those precious poll results.
That there are more articles written about how low republican scandals REALLY are than there are articles written about how high liberal scandals REALLY are, rather than a few selective and biased searches. It means nothing of the party themselves.
When did you form them, in the 9th grade So in your mind Nixon is like George Washington, something way in the past that has no effect on present day policy
duh... if your a liberal, you're less likely to be educated and more likely to be unemployed, leaving you ALOT of time to waste online posting how it's the republicans fault you were born ermm.. democrat.
You saying G. Washington has no effect on present-day policy? LOL. You REALLY have screwed up your history facts. George Washington was the guy that led our country to its independence, and he had a huge influence on our constitution and policies. Nixon is, well, quite a different story.
You trying to turn this into another "welcome back from being banned, anthony" thread? how was exile for posting dumb stuff anyways? Must suck getting voted off the island eh?
I'm wondering if there will ever be a time we actually listen, both to each other, and to what we write when we post. I enjoy posting in this forum, mostly, as I have come to know the views of many with whom I would not normally agree; I have been given food for thought that has brought me to honestly probe my own thoughts and sound out the integrity of my world view. I would be considered "liberal" by many on this forum - Will, Gtech, Mia, Lorien, many more (though a John Bircher by many others, I am sure). I want the best for my country, as, I believe, so do my conservative and neo-con friends on this board. The only way for any of us to get anywhere is to drop the crap - the personal attacks, the moronic insults, the histrionics - hold each other accountable to our views with solid evidence, and have the honor to acknowledge when we've been proven wrong. Let this be a clarion call - from myself first.
ahh, the ideal webforum eh? Sadly, chumps like ags and mix and anthony would still do nothing more than call us wrong, neo-cons nixon lovers or whatnot, only to fail to provide any factual evidence (aside from blogs) to prove their cases.
lol, I know..its really funny too BTW I have a career, a wife, a child, a house, a nice sized boat (49ft. power cruiser), two sport bikes and my internet website hobby. If you think I'm a loser perhaps we should compare portfolios?
Or, call others uneducated louts while trashing gays and the mentally retarded. No one has the monopoly.
Your right, I apologize to the gays and retarded for lumping them together with the liberals... a fate no one wants.
ohhh, thought I was a nixon lover or neo-con or whatever the Michael Moore catch phrase of the day was?
And yet here you are...... Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein, (attributed) US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)