And lets not forget that that plan was put into motion long before Obama so much as knew about it, much less was privileged to have been able to approve it.
before i go to dinner i am going to rip obamanation and mia a new one about this when i get back. and i am pissed off that i only have one green bar so far for my political and religious contributions on this forum. i ripped stox a new one with this thread, http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1884148&page=2#post14673586 how did i only get only one grey rep for this? how many people can say that they ripped stox a new one here? in my settings now since may 14, 2010, i have two grey reps, two red reps and one green rep
stOx is a master of words but his hatred for religion leaves him blind so his logic although well put together always leaves a gaping hole he's not a easy opponent but you can catch him saying nutty things every now and then . I'm curious how your argument with Obamanation will go , the guy is the best word wielder on the forum and has just 1 weak point . I'd say you don't stand a chance but I will be fun to see you try . As for Mia he usually keeps it short and sweet and he doesn't care much for this forum so he's very hard to attack . EDIT : Oh , BTW didn't you ripped yourself a new one when you claimed to be a biochemist then provided a school boy answer at a simple question ?
before i get to the bush doctrine after 9/11. did you read what you just posted? "people who attack the US to exist on your sovereign soil, we will take them out" then you said "When Obama dropped a Seal team into the heart of Pakistan, without so much as telling the government, and shot Bin Laden in the face, thats Bush Doctrine in action." pakistan is not soveriegn soil of the u.s. what are you talking about? does pakistan belong to the u.s.? and if so why did it take so long to find this fugitive? (snotty remark, sorry obamanation, but accurate) alright mia, will tell you that i have a one post solution to shut you down on your opinion about this but i am going to drag this on. if you want you can eleborate on this opinion or not your choice but i will tell you that i have a one post solution to your future statements about this. if you prove me wrong i would be impressed and it's probably something that would be good for me. so try your best or not. here is the bill clinton interview on fox, [video=youtube;WYNI5RPOlp4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYNI5RPOlp4[/video] for the moment forget that he did not kill osama before 9/11, obviously he did not kill osama before 9/11. you can see by his ferver in the interview that he wanted to stop osama. he tried and did not kill osama. and yes he didn't kill osama. what if osama attacked the world trade towers before the embassy bombings in 1999, what if it's 9/11/1999 with reference to the world trade attacks. do you think this guy would not put out a first strike response to osama and terrorists? do you see that it doesn't matter who was the sitting president during 9/11 was and that the same policy of getting these terrorists would be in effect? here is an aside, i have noticed from watching the news and reading newspapers that republicans are more willing to erase most things about the previous demorcats that were in power when they get into power more than democracts are willing to erase things about republicans that were in power when they get into power. is it coincidence or can we ask why?
You chopped the quote. The whole quote was: The "You" in the quote refers to other sovereign nations, just like the "We" in the quote refers to the US. Not sure what was unclear about that.
oh, you should say "if" before the quote to be more clear, sorry. check out the comment i left for mia, the sitting president would have reacted the same way. would it matter if it was a republican or democract that came up with that doctrine?
Hah, partisans don't come up with doctrines these days. Establishment advisers come up with all the work, puppets take the label... "Bush" doctrine lol
funny, i am also interested on how this turns out come on apocalypseXL, biochemists can provide school boy answers as a refreasher of memory, it's all in the repituoir (i don't know how to spell it off the top of my head but finetically, "rep-it-to-war")
hey, if you want to find out more about me check out my "about me" page in my profile. you guys will never find out what my real name is because of what i said there. i think i am the epitomy of what NOT to do when you are a registered republcian during hard line republican times. and you need to know to leave a hard line party as soon as possible if you are not with it.
Wow, you are a very honest man Eric. I've not seen many willing to share their life story in their profile, nor have I seen anyone so obsessed with aligning their life with a political party. I wouldn't be so hard on yourself, politicians themselves are filthy creatures. More people should be apolitical and show support for freedom and individualism, not parties, their policies or puppets. Look what labels do to people. I wish you luck in the future and hope you find the career you're looking for.
there are no strong candidates for president for the republicans in 2012, romny? no, didn't he lose three times already, correct me if i'm wrong? i think obama got his two terms with the osama capture, the obamacare is in the backseat to republicans now because when they yap about, obama got osama, sucks for you. that stuff would weigh heavily for a republican, and i think that sucks, what about healthy americans being a regular priority like capturing osama at the same time? if you want to talk about obamacare here we go without the pronounced republican biases for this topic and now you can see how they can be biased for other topics: most of the civilized world has universal health care, this is from the when obamacare was being pushed. why are the republicans against this? this is just basis human steps with developing, whether it's technology, medicine or whatever, like the automobile. when something that can help a big group of people is provided, you develop it. now america is catching up with the rest of the world with obamacare. i remember when it was a fresh topic, the prominent angle, that i could see from republicans, is that it would deter the big companies in the field. i also remember mia having issue with it with her business, understandable and adjusting of obamacare is not out of the question by a long shot short term because it's a big adjustment but the rooted premises of it needs to be something for all of us in the future. it's something that we can all rally around on in so many angles, humanitary, progressive, etc. businesses will find solutions to this, whether it is a desired want or not. businesses will find a way to move on. the ethics of business will be ok with this. from one angle and from most businesses, you want your customers to be healthy to spend money right?
Don't be so ignorant. Most of the "civilised" world states that their citizens do not have the right to self-defence, unlike America. Obamacare will destroy what's left of America. Nothing agitates me more than people who pass judgement on things they have no experience with. We have "universal healthcare" here and it's a huge blight on our economy and personal freedom.
First of all it takes about two minutes to figure out your real name kid. This isn't an aol chatroom, we do know how to check. Second, the juvenile nature of that profile suggests it was not an accident you have a dozen live links in DP to your "forum" which now redirect to "Adult/" material. What a rookie ruse. You arent supposed to link to Adult material in here. Grow up.
this is health care, it's ok to be healthy. Obamacare will destroy what's left of America. Nothing agitates me more than people who pass judgement on things they have no experience with. We have "universal healthcare" here and it's a huge blight on our economy and personal freedom.[/QUOTE] although you may not like your health care, you are covered (mods, i double posted by mistake, could you merge them please?)
Funny, you used to know how.... http://forums.digitalpoint.com/show...69&highlight=whatisgoingonforums#post12356669 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/show...01&highlight=whatisgoingonforums#post12354001 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/show...91&highlight=whatisgoingonforums#post12135191 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/show...16&highlight=whatisgoingonforums#post12315516 etc.... That site redirects to Adult material. You put it in here multiple times.