republicans and democrats now

back on topic i think most people remember that it was bush that hurt the economy, which drove obama to be president in 2008. and i think whatever his plan that is in place now and the combination of capturing osama is going to help him in 2012

in 2008 obama said that it would take 3 years to recover jobs and here we are, in the middle of that third year.

 

Just my opinion, but...

I don't blame the financial crisis on Bush, and I don't believe that's why Obama got elected.

 

Bush may as well be dead at this point. You can already see the Obama camp trying to wheel his dusty old carcas out to run against in 2012. I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to blame Obamacare on Bush.

I found myself wondering if the voting public would be as angry in 2012 as they were in 2010, but I suspect they are more pissed off than ever. Obama may keep his seat in office, but I suspect we are going to see a Republican house and Senate. How nice will it be to say goodbye to a crack smoking Harry Reed as majority leader?

 

How nice to say goodbye to the Angel Dust / PCP King Jeff Sessions.


Both are lunatics.

 

I believe the name you are looking for is Mitch McConnell, not Jeff Sessions.

 

Mitch McConnell is an old fart that needs to retire. Jeff Sessions of Alabama is a racist pig.

 

I didn't know Obama found and killed Osama with his own two hands.

It's much more likely Osama died in 2001 from his many life shortening illnesses.

Your title should say "Republicans are Democrats now". In fact, I actually thought it said that before I read your post.

@Popotalk, I don't see what Sessions is meant to be doing wrong in the picture you posted.

 

So Reed is a lunatic and McConnell is just old. With such an obvious choice, I'm glad to see you'll be voting Republican in 2012.

 

A$$h---s are A$$h---s. It does not matter to me whether they come from left, center or right.

 

There is plenty of time for the economic recovery to accelerate by Nov 2012.

The Senate is known to be in play however it is just as likely the House will rebound for the Democrats.

 

Comedy!

Just as likely? Hey man, I'd say its possible that monkeys could come flying out of my ass, but assigning equal probability to such events tells me you need to stay away from the casinos. If you don't have that much common sense, I'd be happy to make a wager with you.

 

No serbs would leave iraq alone...not everybody is arrogant and ignorant like the US ... I can understand your views though...you do come from a country of robbers, ethnic cleaners, slave traders, bomb droppers ect... its in your culture to find it completely normal to invade and steal (just like the whole history of the USA is a story of theft and murder) ... so you presume that everybody is like you and that Iraq is just there for the picking...

oh and 10 years from now Im sure Iraq will be a thriving democracy AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA how long has it been since your "liberation"? 6 years? LOL ...nice work (not) ...

 

No, momentum of the economy and the opposite of Republican demagoguery.

 

Put your money where your mouth is:

Dems to control senate after 2012 - 25% chance

Republicans to control house after 2012 - 60% chance

 

Already dropping.......sorry O, and the market is rallying today as well.

 

can you read a chart?

 

Those waves near the end are volatility, not the wishes of the incumbent and most often appear positive prior to the colapse.....

 

What gave you the idea that one particular political ideology killed Osama?

 

His reference was simply pointing out which Administration was successful.

 

everybody knows bush made friends with pakistan right after 9/11 and pakistan was and are against india, who ARE allies of the u.s.

pakistan is getting 2 billion a year for looking for enemies against the u.s. and obama's administration found him, mind you against the principals of bush's doctrine, if you read the responses from this thread.

why did my fellow methodist fail america and not find osama when he could have and obama did. why did bush jump blindly for pakistans help when all that fighting (cue my sarcasim, "oooohhhh") ended up at the border of aftganistan and pakistan? why didn't bush's doctrine go beyond the borders of aftganistan? why didn't bush " not question pakistan because they were ""helping"" us". a border has two sides, where are the enemy going to flow to? obviously the other side and question, did we waste all of those republican years "hoping" that these enemy's of the west, who are going to get 2 billion a year to stop these enemies of the west, were going to stop the enemies? the republicans tossed two billion a year to a known enemy of the west for helping us fight the enemy. all of that money, soldiers and years wasted fighting at a border that was easlily penetrabale by the enemy forces, to enemy lands????

an enemy of india and the west is all of the sudden helping us, are you kidding me.

watch the ending of the hollywood movie "Ghandi" india are not friends with pakistan

obama kicked bush's foriegn policy's ass with this when you examine it.

this is all bullshit.