Guiliani was emotional and had face expression that appeals to certain large group of TV watchers. Paul made more sense, which isn't good. Admission to having read Reagan autobiography will cost him votes. TV watchers don't like people who are smart
Rudy's rebuttal to Ron Paul's comment regarding the Iraq policy was disbelief that US foreign policy which negatively effects foreign nations can cause hate to dwell in those nations. The people who applauded him are morons. His response didn't even have substance. It addressed nothing Ron Paul said. It relied solely on the audience taking offense to Paul's suggestion of listening to other nations. How moronic is that? Reps to Ron Paul for being able to put two and two together along with not trying to manipulate the emotions of the viewers (the "as someone who survived 9/11, ..., how can you possibly think our aggressive foreign policy is the reason people bomb us?, ..., take this moment to retract your statement" BS). Unfortunately it wont get him very many votes. It's funny how mainstream news outlets will host a program explaining how the Iraq war is creating new terrorists, but when Giuliani expresses disbelief in the notion they turn around and use the clip to discredit the valid points Ron Paul brings up. I have to hand it to Rudy though, he knows how to create an emotional response. It's just too bad that most people will equate that emotional response with unequivocal truth.
I know, that's why I did. A staff sergeant wans't running Abu Ghraib. You missed the point...again. Why would they say that if they didn't want to torture people?
Thinking terrorists are not out to kill people is insane, i'm confident in saying you are truly stupid & i'm 100 percent correct in saying such.
I'm continually amazed at what level you just give your credibility to me. I never said anyone was running it. What I did point out, was your continued dishonesty regarding gitmo and comparing it to what happened at abu. It's dishonest. You know it, I called you on it and apprently you don't care that you are exposed as a liar. So now you are doing my work for me? You claim your friends are being tortured, but you can't back it up. So instead, you dishonest post about abu when talking about gitmo. Work with me here, it gets better! So then you admit, above, that you don't have anything to back up your statements and now are just making assumptions? I'd love to take credit for all this, but like you...it would be dishonest to do so. You've done all the work for me. All I have to do is point it out! Personally, I agreed with the candidates last night. The last thing I'd ever want to see is 200,000 people blownup/killed because "boo hoo hoo briant" was upset that it might not be fair to ol' mister terrorist. Wipe your ass and wash away those tears, boy! You nor your terrorist buds are that important!
Nothing because you can. But they are not the same breed of terrorists as the ones AGS doesn't think exist.
After all your, "You can't prove torture," you go and say you agree with it. I mean really, why waste the time? Just be honest in the first place. You know full well the government lawyers argued that torture laws did not apply to those in Gitmo. Why? You know why. Then the republican candidates, except Ron Paul and McCain, who was actually tortured himself, supported torture. Again why bother with the charade? You and your friends support torture. That's the point and Tancredo's comment about "the last hope for Western Civilization" is a laughable when he goes on to condone torture. As for the sergeant being the highest ranking to be convicted at Abu Ghraib, it's clearly important as you well know thers who were actually running that place and giving the orders are not in jail.
Is it possible for giuliani to be more of 911 whore, is it possible he can actually saying anything without trying to stick 911 in
Incorrect. A specific instance was given in which your friends would cause mass death to "my" (not your) fellow countrymen. You, being a selfish and self-centered person, do not care about your country (as continually exhibited) and apparently now, confirming you do not care about your fellow countrymen being slaughtered. The only thing you care about? Terrorists, but of course! 200,000 of your fellow countrymen? No problem, kill them. Ruff up a terrorist? Oh my God!!!!! The debate was not about torture, but rather "enhanced interrogation techniques." Look, it's charming that you only care about terrorists. And refreshing that you finally come out and admit that you care more about terrorists than your own country or fellow countrymen. Me? I care about my country and my fellow countrymen. Even nutjobs like you who would rather die and see hundreds of thousands of your fellow countrymen die. You have your priorities all wrong.
Ron Paul has a tender side for terrorists. Imagine if he cared about his fellow countrymen and wasn't bogged down with "blame America first" disease?
He stated his whole "Blame America" line last night and was ripped a new one by Rudy....lmfao!!! now that is funny!
Since when was being accountable for your actions a disease? What makes you think the US can run amok in the Middle East without repercussions? How is bombing foreign nations "caring for your countrymen"?