You do know watermarks are intended for copyright purposes, right? And if you paid someone to remove this trademark from a video that wasn't yours and the original owner of the video finds out about it, you've just opened yourself up to all kinds of legal issues..........
You dont have any right comment such things without having info regarding job and trying to defame us.
I thought it was his own videos and wanted to remove the watermarks added by, may be, his workers previously!
I have 'the right' to comment on anything I want to comment on and do not need permission or prior consent from you. On a side note, yes - you're sort of right, in that you can be sued for defamation, just like you can be sued for removing watermarks from copyrighted videos. However, your understanding of the word is incorrect. DEFAME verb (used with object), defamed, defaming. to attack the good name or reputation of, as by uttering or publishing maliciously or falsely anything injurious; slander or libel; calumniate: I don't reckon asking if you're aware of copyright laws is the same as maliciously accusing you of breaking them. Guilty conscience much? Good luck with that.
You don't have right comment on anything you want can be sued for this i dont have extra time like you waste on such things so good luck.
Wait. *I* can be sued for commenting on a PUBLIC MESSAGE on a PUBLIC FORUM, but stealing someone's copyrighted work is totally acceptable? *blank stare* Is it time for you meds or mine, man?