Religion Of Peace?

I won't condemn the crime.
I don't agree with it, especially if the Muslims had no dirty laundry. But I refuse to condemn this because frankly, I'm not outraged by it. I can only see this as being revenge for some of the crimes Muslims have committed against Christians.

Again, I don't follow any religion, I just call it like I see it.
In this case, chalk one of for the Christians. I suspect we are going to see more Christian beheadings of Muslims in the future. The more radical actions we see from the Muslims, the more it's going to bring the dark side out of Christians.

Lets not forget, Christians didn't get to be the dominant religion of the world by being nice, they got it by being savages. The Muslims are playing with fire, once they cross that line, they're going to have a really rude awaking courtesy of Christians and Jews. I can't say this bothers me in the least.

 

Of course it doesn't bother you... Most muslims are brown.

 

Your argument is false and weak. It has 100% nothing to do with skin color, it 100% has to do with the religion itself. White, asian, black, brown, whatever. I couldn't careless about the race, it's the religion is despise. You can believe it or not, I really don't care.

Look how many brown and black Christians there are, so by your logic I should also hate Christians.

 

That would be "the reason was?" I have that answer:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/11/the_truth_about_islamic_crusad.html

Obviously some believe the Bibles says "lay down and die." It doesn't.

 

That's right, Keep saying that ly2, Someone might eventually believe you.

 

I am agnostic myself but christians are hardly the only ones who behead people. Just ask Eugene Armstrong

 

The story about the christians cutting two peoples heads off hardly supports what you are saying.

 

Not at all. gworld wouldn't say a peep about it over here.

I doubt you would either

 

Revenge is the least holy of actions, and if you think that humanity in general should work that way then you are condoning every act of imagined revenge from the crusades to the September 11th.

Are you serious? Both Christianity and Islam have an appalling history with limitless blood on the hands of both.

 

Ups ... didn't know history started with muslims

You know GTech those were times you probably don't understand and I just don't have will to debate with you over this subject since you proved numerous times you don't know shit ...

But just for you a little food for thought

Damn those Greeks, Romans, Byzantines ( Christians ) , Muslims, Christians and all those rivalry Caliphs trying to take over...oh and those bloody turks and egyptians
They all had "THE REASON" !

 

But I'm not religious, I don't follow religious rules and principles..

 

Perfect retort and simple reasoning that anyone should get. There hasn't been a justified religious battle in history because religion itself isn't justified! You can't shed blood in the name of a "god" who doesn't exist and call it justified.

 

I wasn't seeking a debate. You asked a question, I provided an answer. Obviously the truth isn't what you were interested in.

 

You need to stop with this "truth" foolishness. We debate these topics because they are open to such - context means everything. In most of these topics there are no 'truths', only opinions. As it happens my opinions are always right, but that's only because I understand the context.

Regardless, your truth is another man's falsehood and vice versa, especially here. Using the word in every second post just makes you look desperate.

 

You may not follow any world religion but we've all seen your behavior which is similar to behavior of those religious fanatics

 

The list you provided is just a list of history events from one date to some other ....You completely ignored other historical events prior to those. That my friend is not the "Truth" !

And you didn't answer the question by the way So I ask you again !

What was the reason ? Revenge ? you funny boy you don't know shit man !

 

Normally I'd probably rip you a new ass for good measure, but that was so funny, I can't stop laughing! Can I have some whip cream and a cherry with those double standards?

 

The question was answered. I suspect you just didn't read it. Were there too many big words for you?

 

As yours is to Alex Jones. I guess we are both political extremists.

 

Cutting the quote in half and presenting it in an alternative context; how very clever Since you need yet another grammar lesson:

My use of quotes in that sentence made reference to your previous posts, therefore the use of the word 'foolishness' was making reference to your use of the word as opposed to the word itself. The point you tried to make in your response was not only grossly incorrect, it also made reference to the meaning of the word. The meaning or concept of the word 'truth' hadn't been called into question by either of us.

You're not going to win with me GTech. I'm under the impression that you've managed to keep many of the members here entranced with your double talk and backwards psychology but you most certainly don't fool me.