Hey, One of my mates is doing religion as Uni with me and shes having trouble understanding the basics of what this question is asking. I'm also having trouble putting it into simpler terms. Could someone please simplify it into an easy to understand question? "do you regard this to be an effective challenge to common assumptions about philosophy of religion?" Many Thanks!
Do you think that whatever is said here challenges the myths or assumptions about philosophy of religion? ^ is this any easier to understand?
First I guess you need to define what is "This". Secondly define the common assumptions and thirdly give a paragraph or two on the philosophy underlining religion. Then combine "This" with what you had mentioned in (2) and (3) to put forth the main arguments and end with a conclusion yes not or partially......Should not take more than a few thousand words.