rel="canonical" Bing/Yahoo

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by rubenmajor, Feb 28, 2011.

  1. #1
    I originally posted this in the Bing area, but got no replies --- so I'm reposting it here, hopefully to get some feedback...

    ---
    Due to some search engine canonical issues (www.site.com, site.com, https://www.site.com), a few days ago I added a rel="canonical" to my homepage - www.cprclass.org. I used the canonical tag due to some URL issues I couldn't correct with a 301/htaccess. I noticed a jump to number 1 on the SERPs for our site's main keywords, but yesterday and today, we seem to have dropped from our number 1 spot. But these are showing old caches so it may just be normal SE behavior...

    My main concern, however, is that I'm wondering if the rel="canonical" is an issue for us for Bing/Yahoo. I just put it on our homepage as:

    <link rel="canonical" href="http://www.cprclass.org/" />

    What we were showing under the results for our canonical before and today (not the brief time we were number 1) was/is: https://www.cprclass.org and http://cprclass.org.

    Finally, what is with the https://www.cprclass.org? I've never used or been linked to from that address before...

    Any thoughts are more than appreciated.
     
    rubenmajor, Feb 28, 2011 IP
  2. mohitsharma

    mohitsharma Peon

    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I will also try to it how it work ? You have really have done a great practical work.
     
    mohitsharma, Feb 28, 2011 IP
  3. pavanseo

    pavanseo Active Member

    Messages:
    144
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #3
    I just checked your cache it is showing result for http://www.cprclass.org/ and cached on 1 march 2011. and your ranking is 5 on your main keyword. when i tried to open with non www it is redirected to www version. SE show result with www show your canonical issue get resolved. and drop in ranking from 1 to 5 is due to canonical issue which is now resolved
     
    pavanseo, Mar 1, 2011 IP