Ray gun makes targets feel as if they are on fire

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by ash1, Jan 24, 2007.

  1. #1
    http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/01/24/ray.gun.ap/index.html

    MOODY AIR FORCE BASE, Georgia (AP) -- The military's new weapon is a ray gun that shoots a beam that makes people feel as if they will catch fire.

    The technology is supposed to be harmless -- a non-lethal way to get enemies to drop their weapons.

    Military officials say it could save the lives of civilians and service members in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.

    The weapon is not expected to go into production until at least 2010, but all branches of the military have expressed interest in it, officials said.

    During the first media demonstration of the weapon Wednesday, airmen fired beams from a large dish antenna mounted atop a Humvee at people pretending to be rioters and acting out other scenarios U.S. troops might encounter.

    The crew fired beams from more than 500 yards (455 meters) away, nearly 17 times the range of existing non-lethal weapons, such as rubber bullets.

    While the sudden, 130-degree Fahrenheit (54.44 Celsius) heat was not painful, it was intense enough to make participants think their clothes were about to ignite.

    "This is one of the key technologies for the future," said Marine Col. Kirk Hymes, director of the non-lethal weapons program that helped develop the weapon. "Non-lethal weapons are important for the escalation of force, especially in the environments our forces are operating in."

    The system uses millimeter waves, which can penetrate only 1/64th of an inch of skin, just enough to cause discomfort. By comparison, common kitchen microwaves penetrate several inches of skin.

    The millimeter waves cannot go through walls, but they can penetrate most clothing, officials said. They refused to comment on whether the waves can go through glass.

    Two airmen and 10 reporters volunteered to be zapped with the beams, which easily penetrated various layers of winter clothing.

    The system was developed by the military, but the two devices being evaluated were built by defense contractor Raytheon.

    Airman Blaine Pernell, 22, said he could have used the system during his four tours in Iraq, where he manned watchtowers around a base near Kirkuk. He said Iraqis often pulled up and faked car problems so they could scout U.S. forces.

    "All we could do is watch them," he said. But if they had the ray gun, troops "could have dispersed them."
     
    ash1, Jan 24, 2007 IP
  2. WebMarketingMan

    WebMarketingMan Guest

    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I've always felt really conflicted about this technology. On one hand it's really effed up and is probably one of those things that shouldn't ever be invented. On the other hand, how sweet would it be to have a freaking ray gun?!?!?! :eek:
     
    WebMarketingMan, Jan 24, 2007 IP
  3. ashaw

    ashaw Peon

    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    New tech is kind of scary. Sure they say its harmless, but how do they know about long term effects? Same goes for everything else. Testing something on a mouse isnt going to prove the product to be harmless.
     
    ashaw, Jan 24, 2007 IP
  4. WebMarketingMan

    WebMarketingMan Guest

    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Couldn't agree more.
     
    WebMarketingMan, Jan 24, 2007 IP
  5. Briant

    Briant Peon

    Messages:
    1,997
    Likes Received:
    78
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Yeah, and I wonder what would happen if you just "sucked it up," and stood there.
     
    Briant, Jan 24, 2007 IP
  6. WebMarketingMan

    WebMarketingMan Guest

    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    They say the gun is "harmless" so I'm sure you'd be fine. There's no way your skin would melt or you'd get cancer or anything. No way. Not a chance. Harmless.
     
    WebMarketingMan, Jan 25, 2007 IP
  7. keisuke takahashi

    keisuke takahashi Banned

    Messages:
    995
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    It harmless huh?
    I don't agree with that :)

    I wonder where would they test that?
    :eek:
     
    keisuke takahashi, Jan 26, 2007 IP
  8. w3bmaster

    w3bmaster Notable Member

    Messages:
    17,594
    Likes Received:
    416
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #8
    It can't be effective on walls and it has a range of 500 meters so not a long rage gun it's like more a wather gun (used to disperse demonstranse) no big deal i'm waiting for the laser gun :)
     
    w3bmaster, Jan 26, 2007 IP
  9. Dudibob

    Dudibob Peon

    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    there was a report on this in Wired magazine a while ago and the reporter had it used on him and it hurts but doesn't. Sounds safer than tasers and less painful than MACE after you have run off
     
    Dudibob, Jan 26, 2007 IP
  10. somegamer

    somegamer Peon

    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    I guarantee you it's more harmless than a real bullet. :D
     
    somegamer, Jan 27, 2007 IP
  11. tesla

    tesla Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,840
    Likes Received:
    155
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    203
    #11
    Great way for police to control crowds.........
     
    tesla, Jan 27, 2007 IP
  12. icepak

    icepak Peon

    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    I bet even tho it only penetrate very thin layer of skin, it's still not good for you, who's to say that such intense heat couldn't cause mutation in the skin which leads to cancer?
     
    icepak, Jan 27, 2007 IP