1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Rate This logo out of /10 !!

Discussion in 'Graphics & Multimedia' started by delusion, Apr 8, 2007.

  1. tegaratv

    tegaratv Guest

    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #21
    nice logo but there is hard to read the logo coz u used many colors"

    7/10
    waiting ur next logo
     
    tegaratv, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  2. uttoransen

    uttoransen Prominent Member

    Messages:
    8,227
    Likes Received:
    550
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    320
    #22
    that is superb! nice! how did you manage that. you got stubmle.in
    nice logo by the way! but i have never though that getting such a popular domain's .in extention will be possible.
    i guess you have done a great job!

    now, cheers! and use that domain properly. nice and colorful logo, 8/10:D
     
    uttoransen, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  3. Celtik

    Celtik Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #23
    7/10.. I just do not like the "in" colors, but other than that I like it
     
    Celtik, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  4. Lpspider

    Lpspider Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,216
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #24
    3.5/10.... could be better.
     
    Lpspider, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  5. TalG18

    TalG18 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    125
    #25
    it is a very nice logo, but not for a proxy site.
    I give 5/10.
     
    TalG18, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  6. chiz

    chiz Peon

    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    I give it a 7. Reasons:
    1. too colorful for my taste. Maybe you could limit the colors and the style. Remember K.I.S.S.
    2. I noticed some jaggies. But then again maybe it'll smoothen in the final copy.
     
    chiz, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  7. Felu

    Felu Peon

    Messages:
    1,680
    Likes Received:
    124
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    I'd give 7/10 for the logo :).
     
    Felu, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  8. waikit86

    waikit86 Peon

    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    5/10
    I think the design is too simple.
     
    waikit86, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  9. WebmasterPost.com

    WebmasterPost.com Active Member

    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #29
    3.654

    why? You asked us our opinion and it makes me think of carebear commercials. I think it's: too colorful, too girly, too lucky charms. If your audience was women, or kids, it would be perfect.

    I'm assuming your site is geared toward Webmasters. 70% of Webmasters are guys. Id suggest you make a logo that better targets your intended audience.
     
    WebmasterPost.com, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  10. toby

    toby Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    269
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #30
    i say 9 coz it looks very cute and young and kiddy.
     
    toby, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  11. EGS

    EGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,078
    Likes Received:
    438
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #31
    I hate it. I'll give it a 2/10.
     
    EGS, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  12. logodesignteam

    logodesignteam Peon

    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    It gives a feeling of being web2.0 ish but it still needs the gloss and curves required to make it reach actual web 2.0 feel.

    As suggested by others it is too colourful. Very basic font has been used. Will look good on white background but might fail on litmus test if other colour backgrounds are used.

    Nice as a web logo but if you want to get it printed some day then it will be a difficult and costly task due to the number of colours and the shadow.

    Overall nice for a basic website, but not great if you really want to use it for a long term branding. For web good, but for outdoor and print media this may need something more.

    Just my 2 cents. Overall nice work friend. You MUST feel proud of your baby.

    Keeping in view the use which you have already specified I WILL GIVE IT 7/10

    eNJOY !!
     
    logodesignteam, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  13. NAS125

    NAS125 Active Member

    Messages:
    382
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #33
    It is prety juvenile! I think it is great work, but for a proxy... Umm... 5/10
     
    NAS125, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  14. lilybaby

    lilybaby Guest

    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #34
    Andy, next time I suggest you write a paragraph or two explaining why you did it. For example, maybe colors do have an explanation and we are judging the logo by tastes, not logically and with reason. Make people read and then, when they see it, boom! (I know thou, that the logo isn't going to be around with an explanation attached to it). But this works.

    6/10
     
    lilybaby, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  15. tokyoice

    tokyoice Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,326
    Likes Received:
    65
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #35
    5/10.

    If it was a kids website and we saw the website with the logo installed I would probaly give 8/10 because it would be really kid friendly.
     
    tokyoice, Apr 9, 2007 IP
  16. Poxicator

    Poxicator Peon

    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #36
    Rather than rate the logo I think I'll make comments on how I'd personally improve it and what I like. Obviously it would help if we knew your target audience as that will greatly effect the design.
    The amount of colours aren't a problem, its fun, a little childish but rich and promotes a feel-good factor, I'd actualy consider removing the charcoal grey for another colour, perhaps pure black, dark blue or even a dark green (suggesting GO). You might even try making the stroke black for .in with white fill. If it were to go to print you'd probably have duller colours because of the limits of cmyk but once you're over 4 cols the costs are the same.
    The white halo is nice, so too is the reflection. The motion blur is effective too however the stars argue with the rest of the design imho. Why are they there? Are they needed? shouldn't they have better grads for the zoom effect and wouldn't the stars be better with rounded edges (as per your type). I'd actually remove them as they make your logo rather high which will probably result in a smaller logo. If you're a fan of them then perhaps make them smaller but think about the fact you have 2 different approaches to movement - the zoom of the stars compared with the motion of the blurred type.
    Turn dithering off to achieve better grads.
    Make all the text level on the baseline to achieve a more realistic reflection (note most letters with their white halo don't touch the horizon but the left hand stroke of the m and the right hand stroke of the n go beyond the horizon.

    OK, I give in, I'll give it 7/10 assuming its work in progress.

    PS: I'm surprised nobody has mentioned www.stumbleupon.com/ :D
     
    Poxicator, Apr 10, 2007 IP
  17. turbulence

    turbulence Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    956
    Likes Received:
    59
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #37
    Following Minute's criteria, I would give

    8 for Attention Grabbing
    6 for Design Originality
    4 for Aesthetic Pleasure rating (somewhat the logo has a colourful but childish look, please, don't find my comment offensive :eek:)
    5 for the X-Factor

    Anyway, my overall rating is probably somewhere around 7. Good job!

    Turbulence
     
    turbulence, Apr 10, 2007 IP
  18. delusion

    delusion Guest

    Messages:
    1,195
    Likes Received:
    77
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #38
    WOW! Thanks guys, very overwhelmed with the number of responses here. A lot of mixed opinions in the crowd, I guess everyone has different tastes.

    Thanks everyone for commenting (I'm still reading through them), especially to @Proxicator and logodesignteam, looks like you guys spent way too long writing that critique :p

    Anyway, thanks again everyone =]
     
    delusion, Apr 10, 2007 IP
  19. EliteFlyers_com

    EliteFlyers_com Active Member

    Messages:
    470
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #39
    i like it but it looks like a daycare logo or something for kids. is that what you were going for. it just doesnt look professional. but i would say 6/10
     
    EliteFlyers_com, Apr 10, 2007 IP
  20. rahulmax

    rahulmax Member

    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    #40
    7/10 .. xept for yellow; cos it has almost the same brightness as the background, so givin a little drop shadow will be, i think much better ;)
     
    rahulmax, Apr 11, 2007 IP