Quick Question regarding Images

Discussion in 'Google' started by sunster13, Aug 19, 2007.

  1. #1
    Is it any worse to have an image or banner linking to my site rather than having a link? Will this still count towards my PR, backlinks etc.?


    Thanks
     
    sunster13, Aug 19, 2007 IP
  2. emptymirror

    emptymirror Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    367
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #2
    It's not worse, no. An image link is still a link and certainly counts toward PR & backlinks just the same as a text link would.

    Make sure there's alt text included. Since there's no link text in an image link, alt text is a useful alternative. For example:

    <a href="http://www.example.com"><img src="/pathtoyourimage/image.jpg" alt="put what you'd usually use as link text here"></a>
    Code (markup):
    cheers ~
    Denise
     
    emptymirror, Aug 19, 2007 IP
  3. rehash

    rehash Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    30
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #3
    even if you use the alt tag, for the serps, a text link with more text around it should be better

    but for PR/backlinks there should be no dif
     
    rehash, Aug 19, 2007 IP
  4. trichnosis

    trichnosis Prominent Member

    Messages:
    13,785
    Likes Received:
    333
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
    #4
    it's not bad.

    links with images and links with anchor text will be counted as backlinks
     
    trichnosis, Aug 19, 2007 IP
  5. Pedro Monteiro

    Pedro Monteiro Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,261
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #5
    Exactly, the only difference is in the relevance weight of the link.

    And anchor text of a textlink tends to get more relevance "points" then the ALT text of an image link.
     
    Pedro Monteiro, Aug 19, 2007 IP