President Bush Fan Club because he is not all bad

No, supporting terrorists is just supporting terrorists. In your case, it's clear you don't support the troops, you don't support America and you don't support Iraqis.

Not much left to support, is there?

Checkmate.

 

ha ha ha .... Gtech you must be a Good Chess Player.

 

I think starting this thread has been kind of revealing for me. I say to post one positive thing, and they cannot even comprehend that concept. I post about an american soldiers blog, and all they do is insult him. I think that is very low.

 

see yet again

you don't support America != I don't support bush and his failed policys

not supporting bush is not equal to not supporting america,

 

What I like about President Bush...

It's been a while since we had a moron in the White House. I do like the fact that someone with half the I.Q. of a Rock can run the best country ever and some people agree with his administration's plans and actions.

That's always funny...

 

Hey Rebecca,

Sorry to break your heart but I think Bush had a ton of Muppets on his side after 9/11 and now they're seeing that Jim Henson died a long time ago... Bush is no Jim Henson!

The Muppets are leaving the show... time for a new Ring Leader.

 

It's been a few years, but yes, I enjoy a good game of chess.

In the case of the direction of the thread, when people are willing to publicly disclose information that makes clear what they do not support, and we eliminate the possibilities of what there is to support by noting what they are against, the possibility remaining seems quite obvious...especially when they are outspoken on everything but that last possibility.

I don't think it's anything to be ashamed of, per se, it's just what it is. If you are against America, against the soldiers and against the Iraqis, but never have a bad word for the terrorists, it doesn't take Ray Charles to see the obvious.

 

GTech:

How would you describe the majority of American voters in the last election?

After extensive reading of polls and exit poll analysis it appears that the votes against many repuplicans running for office and for democrats were votes primarily against this administration and republican domination of the legislature.

It appeared to me that voters in the middle of the political spectrum moved from supporting republican candidates to supporting democratic candidates. Most of the movement were these people in the middle.

How do you characterize them?

 

I think the majority of Americans are terrorist or terrorists supporters by Gtech definition.

 

I'm not describing America voters, but if I were, I'd say the majority DO support their country and DO support the troops. I would also say that they made clear their choice in 2004 as they did in 2006 and if that majority didn't matter in 2004, then why would someone suggest they do today? Did you previously base your opinions on the majority of what Americans voted in 2004? Or were your beliefs based on what the minority voted? It works both ways, you know

What I'm describing are posters here in THIS forum. There is a difference and based upon your level of semi-rational posts in the past, I expect you would see the difference.

Re-read what I posted earlpearl. Take "Bush" out of the equation of what I posted and think about it. I won't call you a Bush supporter for thinking rationally. It's really very simple deductive reasoning. One of which I have no concern you fall into. However, there are some that clearly do.

 

do you understand that terrorists don't repersent the US and arn't funded by our tax money? don't you?

you can say all the bad words you want about the terrorists, but they don't care

whereas when someone is using to the US military, which repersents us and is funded by us in manner that clearly doesn't benefit us. We should speak out against it. And they should listen to us

Did you miss the last election results?

republicans == losers

 

If they were, you'd certainly have no problem with America.

I've made no definition of the majority of Americans, but remember the time you referred to Americans as ignorant, and of course, we have your recent "lack of intellegence" post about soldiers. Having never a bad word for terrorists, barring one exception (after I hounded you), I believe most know where you fall. You even went to the extreme of starting a support thread for an al qaida terrorist.

Checkmate

 

Are you trying to make excuses for the truth?

There's really no excuse for it. You either do, or do not.

 

Google is almost on web 3.0(semantic web) as you see, even Googlebot knows that george w. bush sucks!

 

I think it is nice to have a President who hasn't sold any military secrets to China. That is a nice change.

 

It's nice to have a President who has committed treason. One who doesn't have a long history of bashing our troops and making false allegations towards them.

 

Actually, as it is shown in my quote, it is official US army position that in order to be able to reach their recruiting goals, they should be able to recruit even dumber people than was previously permitted according to already low intelligence standard. It seems not that many intelligent people would like to be killed for nothing.

 

Actually, nothing could be further from the truth. There is no mention by the US Army of stupid/dumb soldiers in the least bit. Proving that you are prepared to lie to achieve your objective of bashing soldiers and America.

To further illustrate your intentional bias with an already biased report:

To further prove your own personal hatred towards them, you refer to others as "even dumber people than was previously permitted." As if you, personally, are in some "smarter" category of people to put them down. I think your posts more than contradict that.

As I said above, if you don't support America, you don't support the troops and you don't support Iraqis, there's not much left to support. Except one. Thanks for confirming this, gworld.

 

ahhh.... thank god ... somebody really agrees with my ideas ..

 

Bush just attacked iraq because he owns alot of oil then the price got up and he gets more profit from AMERICANS! I really don't see why americans are supporting him, they are paying 2x more for oil because of him!