President Bush Fan Club because he is not all bad

LOL, which country invented the language?

Of course we have different words with the same meaning, but I am sure that you'll probably be able to pronounce "nuclear" properly just like I can.

 

Texans don't speak normal English, you are lucky you can understand him at all. Then put him through the snobby colleges and you get a snobby Texan accent/language.

Then you have Schwarzenegger..

 

Bush was elected...september 11th happened, tons of people died, bush sent troops over seas to fight the war on terror and americans voted him back in office...If he was doing such a horrible job, why did American's relect him?

 

You might want to watch this buddy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtPiGIqSljE

It is uploaded in 9 different parts (you'll see them om that page.)
I did have the complete video on my site but Google Video removed the documentary that I was linking to from their Google Vid site.

 

I still find it funny that de-bold didn't miscount this time according to some. There's no worry as long as 'my side' wins.

I'm getting to believe that's the sentiment.

 

Maybe they did miscount this time but just not enough

This kind of doubt surrounding the election process is worrying.

 

Indeed.

The only real way is for people to hand count each and every one, a cross on a piece of paper is difficult to manipulate, changing figures electronically is easy.

Of course it would be a huge operation requiring thousands of people to count the votes but with the importance of a national Presidential election surely that is the best and fairest way to do it.

 

Its funny the libs are so concerned about acurate voting, but they don't think people should have to show id to vote.

Libs don't seem to have a problem with dead people voting either.

 

It is not liberals who are against the national ID, it is anyone who does not think the government should have the power to document everything about us. I am a libertarian, not liberal by any stretch of the imagination.

I agree coughalgorecough

 

I didn't say a national id. Just some id. You have to show id to buy alcohol, smokes. I think you have to show id to get a movie rental card. I don't think being required to show a government issued id to ensure people voting have the right to vote, and voting where they should be, and are voting only once is a huge infringement on privacy. If you registered to vote, the government has the info anyway.

Here in Wisconsin the Democrat governor has vetoed the law requiring id multiple times, even after the legislature provided funds so even the poor could obtain id. Ofcourse this is the same state that the democrats drive around picking up homeless people and offering smokes for their votes.

 

What if that ID card had a RFID chip in it?

Would that bother you carrying it around with you?

 

Yes, hell yes. It bothers me precisely because it is the government issuing these ID's and controling when it is mandatory to have them.

I would definitely agree with some id(I rhymed) as long as there is no national database of information.

 

Haha, that was great! I actually had already watched in on HBO, I'm very well informed. I'm not here to chnage anyone minds and just about any info against Bush you could show me, I have probably already read or saw, however, the main reason I support bush is because everyday he does the same thing, he doesn't and hasn't backed down. At least he stands behind what is right. I am neither a democrat nor a republican, I vote for whom I think will be the best president. Do I think everything Bush has done is right? Hell No!!! But as I stated he stands behind what he believes and doesn't back down.

Mark my words, if this election the democrats win, they won't pull out the troops, they are just saying that to get elected. I could be wrong, but that is just what I feel. Does that mean I won't vote for a democrat...no, cause I believe either way the troops are staying over there (as much as I hate to see that) I will vote for whomever seems to be the best and seems like they will work on the issues at hand. Simple as that. I voted for Bush and I support Bush, he may not be the best president, but he isn't the worst. Just my opinions.

 

I see the objection to that, and I'm not promoting that. But verification of identity prior to voting should be required.

To answer your question, no it wouldn't bother me. I don't care if the government knows that I went to Sam's club and then the gas station on my way home from work.

 

Thats all I'm saying...positive identification prior to voting. Then cross the name off the list and they can't vote again.

 

I expect you'll be the first in line to be microchipped too eh?

 

Most law abiding citizens aren't bothered - at least for now. The problem is when certain laws will rewrite our constitution and things like religion are outlawed (communistic view) and then you can't live your life law abiding anymore and they know everything you are doing.

 

Exactly, when I said just some type of id with no national database, I meant just some type of id with no national database.

 

One good thing about President Bush? He isn't John Kerry.

 

Take a nice read of this:

http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/the-end-of-the-bush-dynasty