PR5 without inbound links?

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by siraxi, Jan 9, 2006.

  1. #1
    Hello

    I've been asked how come a site I own (www.physician.ro) has a PR5 but no inbound links. I have no idea. Where did that PR come from?

    Could someone please explain it to me? Did it happen to others too ? (reaching a relatively high PR without inbound links)

    The domain name is fairly new (Sep 2005)

    Thanks!
     
    siraxi, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  2. Cristian Mezei

    Cristian Mezei Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    355
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    213
    #2
    physician.ro is a PR0 :)
     
    Cristian Mezei, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  3. LinkAssistant

    LinkAssistant Guest

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    According to my Google Toolbar, the PageRank of http://www.physician.ro/ is 5. Seems like you were looking at http://physician.ro/, expertu
     
    LinkAssistant, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  4. wrmineo

    wrmineo Peon

    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    379
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    The page does have backlinks. Just because Google doesn't show them, doesn't mean they don't exist or aren't being counted.

    However, based on the limited backlinks that it does have and the fact that they've already been "devaluled" I would guess this page will drop some PR in a few weeks when the next update propogates; likely down to a PR3.
     
    wrmineo, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  5. LinkAssistant

    LinkAssistant Guest

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    According to what I can see, your website still has some incoming links (like here (http://www.legaturi.ro/index.php?page=link&id=246&limit=70,10) or here (http://www.links24.ro/Sanatate/Medicina.aspx) , and some more). Perhaps this was enough to get PR of 5.


    By the way,
    Did you buy this domain name at Sep 2005 or this domain is absolutely new?
     
    LinkAssistant, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  6. webbom

    webbom Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    170
    #6
    This is just a guess but it can be that you submitted it to this directory http://www.legaturi.ro which is a pr5, and google indexed the link when it was in the latest added links section "Ultimele 10 adaugate"

    In other words, you got lucky :)
     
    webbom, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  7. wrmineo

    wrmineo Peon

    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    379
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Yes, there was an update 19-Oct so very lucky with the indexing and timing; however, the directory mentioned is showing a decrease, so likely this page will suffer a bit too as a result.
     
    wrmineo, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  8. siraxi

    siraxi Peon

    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Thanks pals. So, it was a lucky shot. :D (the domain name was registred new)
     
    siraxi, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  9. BILZ

    BILZ Peon

    Messages:
    1,515
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    BILZ, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  10. Cristian Mezei

    Cristian Mezei Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    355
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    213
    #10
    Cristian Mezei, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  11. DomainMagnate

    DomainMagnate Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    10,932
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    #11
    WOW, didn't know it's so easy to get a pr6 link lol
     
    DomainMagnate, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  12. siraxi

    siraxi Peon

    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Good news - I want to share this with you all:
    It seems that it was not just luck. Somebody pointed out to me that I posted on a forum (drupal.org) on October 10, asking for assistance with the drupal installation. That forum post got quickly a PR6 (main drupal website = PR7).
    That must been the cause of the PR5 on the first update (October 19).
    I just checked, many other posts didn't get that PR, only a few - so it was a little luck there.

    Conclusion: post on high PR forums and include your link!
    Possible hint: install drupal on your website and discuss about it on the drupal forum. :)
    Question: what other high PR forums do you know?! ;)
     
    siraxi, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  13. Cristian Mezei

    Cristian Mezei Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    355
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    213
    #13
    It isn't Michael. This is and was PURE luck from the beggining.

    I think his post was on the first page of the Installation problems category, when the PR update happend. So his page got a PR6 too (luckily).

    And even more luck : the only outbound link, in that page, is his URL :)
     
    Cristian Mezei, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  14. siraxi

    siraxi Peon

    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    I think you're right, expertu. This was topic no: 33606. The topics 33607-33609 also got PR6, while the previous ones <=33605 and following ones >=33610 have PR0 or not at all.
    Your theory explains it. Cool!
     
    siraxi, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  15. siraxi

    siraxi Peon

    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Another one: this thread is very tough, a hard nut to crack :)

    Look at this post on drupal forum - the famous PR6 post that already made history: http://drupal.org/node/33606. It has a PR6, right ?!
    Okay, now search on Google for some text in that post such as "I installed Drupal on a new website" (with quotation marks). This page doesn't come up in the results?

    How can this be: a page to have a PR6 but seemingly NOT indexed by Google ?!?? :eek:
    I'm stunned. Does anyone have a clue?!
     
    siraxi, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  16. Sham

    Sham Peon

    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Hmm, technically an "immoral" person could simply reply to that post including their URL.... :cool:

    I'll be right back....
     
    Sham, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  17. Cristian Mezei

    Cristian Mezei Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    355
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    213
    #17
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=http://drupal.org/node/33606&btnG=Google+Search

    The page IS indexed. BUT ... The page does not have the title and description and cache anymore. Why ?

    Because the real PR of this page now is like 0 or 1. This page does not have that PR6's category first page link. That was for one day maybe, exactly when the PR update happend (or before or after a little).

    Way to go man. You'll just have a link in a PR0 page at the next update.

    Immoral you say huh ? ;)
     
    Cristian Mezei, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  18. Jade456

    Jade456 Peon

    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    Easy come, easy go........

    That's thing with chasing links for page rank, page rank can be a temporary thing, so go for quality, not page rank. IHMO
     
    Jade456, Jan 9, 2006 IP
  19. EGS

    EGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,078
    Likes Received:
    438
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #19
    I don't believe Google just bases site PageRank based on inbound links / backlinks. I believe that they also determine it by the amount of time the site has been up and running. Many websites these days, in Google's eyes, are non-quality and end up shutting down so Google is trying to not include websites that'll just close down in time and be out of their index. Also, I read that Google knows that some websites are just used for spammers for a period of time, and Google tries to not include them in their index.
     
    EGS, Jan 9, 2006 IP