PR5 but Not Cached by google??

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by Avromi, Jun 5, 2007.

0
  1. #1
    Hi,
    I saw a page that had a PR5 but was not cached by google.
    Does anyone know why this happened?
    Thanks
     
    Avromi, Jun 5, 2007 IP
  2. jdR!pper

    jdR!pper Peon

    Messages:
    4,974
    Likes Received:
    564
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    It could be that:

    -the site was just recently set up on a PR5 domain.
    -302 redirect

    --Joe
     
    jdR!pper, Jun 5, 2007 IP
  3. jl255

    jl255 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    211
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #3
    agreed. It cld be a dropped domain or an expired domain. Whatever the case, it wld prob not maintain as PR5 unless the owner does some SERIOUS marketing...
     
    jl255, Jun 5, 2007 IP
  4. FeldBum

    FeldBum Peon

    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Hi Avromi,

    Got the PM and checked out the site. Very weird. The internal pages are all cached and show up in a site: command, but the main page is nowhere to be seen.

    I also checked the PR on iWebTool's PR Checker, and it's a PR5 on all servers.

    Again, very weird.
     
    FeldBum, Jun 5, 2007 IP
  5. sweetfunny

    sweetfunny Banned

    Messages:
    5,743
    Likes Received:
    467
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    They could of had the "no-cache" directive in their Meta.

    For example, PR8 and no cache - http://www.nytimes.com/
     
    sweetfunny, Jun 5, 2007 IP
  6. Cypherus

    Cypherus Peon

    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    102
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    It's possible to prevent Google and other SE's to cache your site, trought robots.txt, .htaccess or something like that. I've never done, so I'm not sure how. But I know it's possible!
     
    Cypherus, Jun 5, 2007 IP
  7. Sherlock

    Sherlock Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #7
    maybe the site needs to be crawled and submitted again?
     
    Sherlock, Jun 5, 2007 IP
  8. champ_rock

    champ_rock Peon

    Messages:
    3,349
    Likes Received:
    115
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    It is a FAKE pagerank definately
     
    champ_rock, Jun 5, 2007 IP
  9. Cypherus

    Cypherus Peon

    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    102
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Or it could be what I said. They don't want SE's to index them..
     
    Cypherus, Jun 5, 2007 IP