Porn definitely does not have more benefits than it does side effects. Porn is only going to get bigger and more acceptable as a way of life. 10 years ago there were never porn channels on TV, now there are hundreds!! Porn = Evil
The Playboy Channel launched in 1982, and according to my mathematical deductions, 1982 was over ten years ago. Porn has always been around, and it's not going anywhere. This fact may upset you, but honestly, it gives me great solace and peace of mind to know that porn will always be here for me. P.S. This thread is hilarious.
Oh, and internet porn caused all that. You ought to be removed from the internet because you lack the knowledge of history, don't you know all that happened before the internet was even around come on, get real. Old porn from the 1920's Wired.com (warning...nude babes) and before that, they have some underground gathering places where they do some funky-ass naughty stuff and who knows what those really are.
Well I think this is a never ending topic.. so its better that we leave it the way it is going. Everybody has different thinking about SEX according to their religion, culture, traditions. So religion says SEX is sin and some God and Goddess perform kamasutra. So definition of SEX depends from people to people, country to country and religion to religion. So it will be better if we leave this topic and accept this term the way it is. Anyways SEX is a part of life and not heart of life. Regards
That's probably because the average western TV had 5 channels. Nowadays there are tens of thousands of TV channels broadcasted. And as mentioned by someone else, pornography wasn't introduced by the internet. Erotic videos and pornography magazines have been around for decades.
Well it's getting bigger because of the net. If we have to, we should go back to late night sex shops and keep it underground and a tabboo from todays society because we live in a porn saturated world which is ruining the world.
screw that, porn is like one of the big money makers on the net, you think people will just simply shut down? Give me a friggin break. Besides, I love porn and so does many more people all over the world. Even without watching porn online, teens can still have sex and stuff with condoms and get AIDS because they will always be curious about sex. So keep your BS away please.
Wait, you think that people having sex and filming it is ruining the world? Seriously? You are here giving your opinion because .... your parents had sex. And I'm almost positive that while your dad was going at it with your mom, he was watching it happen. Why wouldn't he? Men are visual creatures. Therefore, your existence is based on a person that watched a graphic display of sex. Just what do you think porn is ?
I'm sure most people agree that there is too much pornography and exposure to sexual material in the world today.
You are joking right? Then we should remove shopping sites from the Internet as well, people are addicted to that and some children use their parents credit cards without their permission. Oh, and religious sites. Yeah, ban those. They might offend another religion. Oh, and music sites. Yeah, they might expose children to dirty words. Political sites, as they might give children ideas that their parents don't want them to know about. News sites, because they talk about violence in the world. Let's ban Humpty Dumpty off the Net too, shows kids that people are cruel, and let's ban... I mean seriously. Should there be a little more decorum regarding what they show up front on the first page? Yeah, that I can go along with. It should be a lot harder for kids to access this stuff, sure. I raised six kids in my lifetime. Boys masturbate, kids are curious. I had both girls and boys. It was up to ME to regulate their Internet/TV time, not the responsibility of government or the world at large... MINE!. They are adults now, all of them are doing fine thank you. Parents... Be responsible for who you let loose on society! That is your ONLY REAL JOB! If you made 'em, then YOU raise 'em! It's on YOU!
Define "most". And what are the sources of these elusive statistics that you keep referencing? Your preacher at church does not count as one, sorry.