[POLL] IF Ron Paul looses out in the Primaries, Who would be the next best candidate?

Gtech, we are still waiting for you to show us the wmd's

Proven wrong yet again and still wont admit it.

where was the al quaeda? Seems like the one who thinks everyone is dishonest turns out to be the most dishonest. I asked for proof on the wmd's and since you cant prove where they were and your man bush admitted there were no wmd's you decide instead of doing the right thing and admitting your wrong to take a shopping break.

WE ARE WAITING FOR YOUR PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mossadegh- we are still waiting for the proof!!!!!!

 

Once again, the dishonesty continues. Grim, are you capable of following along what I wrote earlier? I know it's probably asking a lot, especially from you. I was neither a democrat, a republican, a liberal, a conservative, or anything prior to 9/11. Not knowing what the differences where, nor having been involved in politics prior to that, like many Americans, I voted based upon debates and those appealed to the needs I had at the time.

I might also point out that you voted for John Kerry in the last election. You simply could not get more liberal than that. Period.

Kettle, meet pot.

 

I'll wait for grim to call you on this one. He's smart enough to have read the source I provided. Wait, he also read the sources of ron paul defending his newsletters, but said they were not proof.

Nevermind

 

What if someone were the kettle and the pot, would that mean that they will start talking to themselves? Instead of saying " I gtech was wrong and you pingpong were right" your trying to deflect the blame for your many innacuracies which we have all called you out on.


See folks, gtech knows there were no wmd's because he could never give us a link to them.

Lieing is one thing but stubborness to admit that your wrong on top of that?

Ok so you admit in your own way there was no proof of wmd's being found when we invaded.

Thanks

 

You're kidding me right? No Child Left Behind? Massive deficits? Doubling the size of the department of Ed?

What's Republican about any of that?

 

This is reflective of gtechs warped view of what the term republican means.

Now that he knows there were no wmd's im now waiting for the proof of the al qaeda being in iraq.
All it will take is gtech admitting he can prove neither of these and i will drop this subject

 

LOL Gtech, I was only using your own lack luster logic against you.
Yes I voted for Kerry, more a vote against Bush.
Liberal, oh please Gtech I am far from liberal.
I am about as far reaching on 2nd amendment rights as you can find, I am for personal liberty, I am for small government, I am for the government staying the hell out of my and your business.

Liberal, oh please Gtech. I hated Clinton with a passion!

More dishonesty from you Gtech. I am waiting for the proof of the white power meetings, not proof of the newsletters

 

All gtech can do is throw more innuendos and links to shady online websites. Now if it were up to him we would have invaded iraq based on his finds in newsbusters hehehehehehe. Imagine him getting us into ww3 based on links from those sites.

Gtech said wmd's found yet he has no proof
gtech claimed al queda found= yet no proof
Gtech claimed mossadegh was a communist then when shown about how he was against the soviet union turned him into a socialist= no solid proof of either.

Despite his leader bush saying there were no wmd's found he persists on
showing us links from news busters that they were found( maybe getch knows something our president doesnt)

there are 2 inconsistencies with gtechs posts i have seen
1. He tries to twist facts and the truth
2. he tries to twists facts and the truth with no proof whatsoever or links to shady sites that no one in their right mind would take seriously lol.

I sure am glad my credibility isnt slipping.

 

Oh, that's simple. What it isn't, is gutting America, dismantling America, telling children "hey, we gots ours, you go get yours."

What's republican about blaming America first? What's republican about giving aid and comfort to terrorists? What's republican about about putting the largest state sponsor of terrorism upon a pedestal?

What's republican about gutting America? What's republican about gutting the IRS with no thought about consequences? What's republican about making it clear that one would never defend America? What's republican about railing against Israel and "neocons" (code word for Jews that ron paul says in every TV appearance) in every debate?

Please, don't pee on my head and tell me it's raining. You've railed against republicans since you've been here and defended democrats at every opportunity. And you want me to believe YOU are a republican? Pfft! Tell it to pingy, he'll believe anything.

 

Being republican is about being honest and not twisting facts and recklessly getting us into wars over lies and no proof of wmd's and al queda.
Gtech are u sure your republican again?

 

sycophant - A sycophant (Gr. συκοφάντης) is a servile person who, acting in their own self interest, attempts to win favor by flattering one or more influential people, with an undertone that this is at the cost of their own personal pride, principles, and peer respect.

Hope you enjoyed today's lesson, pingy

 

So you are saying you retract your honesty, because it would not be the popular thing to do in the presence of your support base?

So, you voted for a liberal?

I wonder who Guerilla, pingy, guru (not sure if he can even vote) voted for last election.

But look at all those ron paul supporters jumping ship, in the poll, to Obama?

BTW, I did note you were the lone ron paul supporter to stay on the republican side by selecting McCain. A good choice. I've been tough on McCain in the past, but having the opportunity to see him in the debates, I've started to warm up to him. He's not perfect (none are), but he's a good man.

 

Pingy, you're about as liberal as they come. Perhaps you were not aware that democrats wanted war with Iraq in the 90s? Please don't make me dig up my old links to all those democrats who said Iraq had WMD, and were correct.

Not that it matters, really. Some people dismiss facts and then set off to call for them again. Sound familiar?

 

Nope I was showing you how illogical your point of view was Don't like it when someone uses crap on you do you? Now you know why we don't like it either.

You did as well, in Clinton and Bush might I add. Bush is FAR from a republican.

Why does it matter? You appear to be so dead set on party lines, of course your debate style sure shows that. But yet again you voted for Clinton

My wife voted for Bush the first time around, sickened by what he became she voted for Kerry last time. Guess with your 'cough' logic she must be a liberal.

Many have gone to McCain, many McCain supporters would support RP if they thought RP had more of a chance, but I know you dont' want to hear that.

I like McCain, I do not like his stance on immigration or the war however.

 

Grim, the difference is, you knew better. Back then, I didn't. I simply called you on what you called me on. Does it matter? Sure, it matters when guerilla attempts to use dishonesty about me, to redefine him/herself as a republican, which is pretty laughable at best. He's railed against republicans, always defends liberals, and most republicans I know do not make posts on public forums putting the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism on a pedestal.

 

lmao. Great post. And you have the unmitigated gall to call me dishonest. Oh brother. My sides hurt from laughing.

 

It was a great post, and yes, your post was dishonest. Should I expect anything less than dishonesty when you post?

 

I don't think I can post on your level, but I will keep trying.

 

I won't argue with that.

 

GTech how many more times are you going to crop peoples quotes for a cheap dig?

It's boring, and childish.