The design is very nice. However, the text size is a bit too small and difficult to read. And because the site is in flash, it is not good for SEO.
I agree, the text is difficult to read, but I don't think it's too small. It just seems kinda fuzzy. Other than that, it looks really nice. I also second the flash thing. Not good for SEO unless you're planning on getting some really good incoming links.
Because you dont have a HTML page with pictures and all your text, as the others have said above, it means your search engine optimization is not very good at all on your pages , thus leaving you not indexed high within the search engine network. As for you design yes also agreed the text is very hard to read on the page making it less appealing to your visitors, meaning people will not stay on your site..
Yuck, Flash. You really should offer visitors something if they don't have Flash - preferably a full HTML-only version of the site. I can't comment on the site itself, since Flash isn't available for my platform (64-bit Linux) - there's no Flash for 64-bit Windows either, which more-and-more people are starting to use.
Killer graphics. Quick loading. Apparent you put a lot of thought and time into this. However, I do have to agree with most here that made comments about your text being hard to read. Giving folks an option to view the flash site or HTML site does make since to me. what I have always wondered about flash is how a search engine is going to pull any of your content? If you aren't concerned about that it is of course a mute point. Just thinking out loud here. Mike C.
that's not completely true. I use swishmax sometimes for flash, and all text displayed on the flash site will be copied to your keyword meta tag when you convert it to swf...
nice site, text is ok and the style of the font goes with the website. dont think you'll get many hits from search engines because its flasjh. Also noticed squares in the title, is that because of the character set?
Nice site. I agree with some of the other comments made about it being in Flash and site bots won't be able to read that. On a side note, I didn't know 'ph' was a TLD. I guess ya learn something new everyday.
Firstly, nicely done compared to atleast 60% of other sites out there! Now: - A Full flash site, i always stay clear of those. Too hard to maintain .I hope you dont plan on having many sites cause your going to have one hell of a hard time managing them all if there flash based. - Not very SEO friendly, though you may not care about that - Color scheme wasnt very user friendly, use of lots of dark colors don't go well in many day internet parlours or offices with lots of lights (due to glares) - Agree with deadintoit in that you should offer a non-flash site ps. one of the most annoying things in webdevelopment is static sites (ie. sites that dont change after a users 5 or 6th visit) Full flash sites fall into this category.. ie. flast sites find it hard to retain users over a long period of time!