I have just completed new website tools for webmaster and seoer. Our free services including Search Engines, Domain Whois, Traffic Analysis, PageRank Checker, Search Site Same, HTML and Other many useful tools. We help you improve your site's performance in search. Get access to free reports, tools and resources, tips to optimize your website for the search engines and visitors. We provide useful services for website owners, including: Review of your site content or structure Technical advice on website development: for example, hosting, redirects, error pages, use of JavaScript Content development Management of online business development campaigns Keyword research Check page rank website Search similiar sites Visit my site: http://www.websitetools.us
Yes... you just bought a brand new cutestat script... nothing new, nothing unique except for the logo(s)... amazing what else to say?
oh oh abyse, you wrong about my site. We not use cutestat script, It's private cms and layout cover from some site as cutestat and other site Our site use private framework and quicker cutestat very very much. "Abyse" - you should check my site before post reply Tnks
Broken attempt at responsive (likely due to some halfwit framework)? CHECK. Illegible absurdly undersized fixed metric (aka px) fonts? CHECK. Painfully slow page-load due to wasting hundreds of K of code on 2k of plaintext and a dozen content images? CHECK. Gibberish use of numbered headings? CHECK. Idiotic scripttard menu asshattery that's supposed to make mobile nicer, when it actually makes things harder to use. ... and that's before looking under the hood at the HTML 5 for nothing code bloat, absolute URI's for no good reason, clearing DIV like it's still 2001, endless pointless DIV for nothing garbage mated to uselessly vague classes; the last of those easily blamed on the idiotic halfwit dumbass bullshit that I can't fathom how anyone is dumb enough to waste time using known as bootcrap. Do yourself a favor, start over from scratch with semantic markup, separation of presentation from content, forgetting that crutches for cripples like bootcrap and jQueery even exist. You might want ot also axe all those pointless META nothing gives a flying purple fish about, and maybe use values that actually EXIST in your robots meta? (since there is no such thing as 'follow' or 'index') Not good... and yeah, it looks like a bad clone of cutestat; which means that like most such "tools" it serves no legitimate purpose if you have ANY clue what you are doing. But to put that in perspective, I say the same thing about GA so...
Hi deathshadow what do you check my site by tools? I checked my site vs cutestat.com, pagespeed always over 90, (cutestat.com only 80) (i optimized image, css, js, cache header and list other optimized) This is capture Google Pagespeed of Websitetools.us VS Cutestat.com Please check and review Thanks. Pagespeed of websitetool.us Pagespeed of Cutestat.com
Waterfall built into firebug and/or dragonfly, "Document size" from the Web Developer Toolbar for Firefox, "View Source" in the browser, and the most important tool of all -- what's between my ears. Size Uncompressed Size 1 Document 4 KB 21 KB 25 Images 65 KB 65 KB 0 Objects 4 Scripts 39 KB 116 KB 3 Style Sheets 24 KB 143 KB 33 Files 132 KB 345 KB Code (markup): Which works out to about five or six times what so simple a site needs.... anywhere from 5 to 25 seconds of handshaking for the files, and up to a second and a half to process all the CSS and scripting on mobile. I've stopped trusting garbage like Google Pagespeed as they now seem more interested in selling you something and blowing smoke up your backside, than they are actually helping people make faster pages... as evidenced by them giving 64k pages built from 8 files or less lower ratings than multi-megabyte monstrousities built from hundreds of files JUST because the smaller page isn't using a CDN of some other goofy bit of technology, regargless of the fact the smaller page in facts loads ten times faster... That's when I started calling bullshit on those 'tools'. Kind of like the BS that pageRank and Alexa rankings are now; particularly the latter with it's made-up fairy-tale bullshit numbers; MORE so since what alexa uses for tracking is blocked by many browser makers AND pretty much all real anti-malware. Such things are currently just another bit of misinformation used by scam artists to justify their sleazeball nube predation. I also used my eyeballs and the document inspector tools (firebug / dragonfly) -- color contrast issues are readily visible (or should we say invisible as the case may be); as a 8514 / Large Fonts / 120dpi / 125% / win7 Medium Fonts / WhateverTheDevilThey'reCallingThemThisYear user pages that don't use dynamic fonts stick out like a sore thumb as they send me diving for the zoom; and the best test for mobile/responsive is to, well... use it. The "view source" really showed where most of the problems were coming from. Crap like jQuery... Crap like Bootstrap... and broken/pointless/buggy coding practices like the endless pointless DIV for nothing, presentational images in the markup, pointless TITLE attributes, clearing DIV like it's still 2001, static style inlined in the markup, incomplete/inaccessible forms, gibberish use of numbered headings, and little if anything resembling semantics... hence your 20k of invalid markup trying to do 10k's job... On top of the absurd 143k of CSS doing 15-20k's job and 116k of scripting on a page that by all rights isn't doing anything that warrants the presence of JavaScript in the first place; well, unless you really have your heart set on that fugly broken "lazyload" garbage and making the site load slower. That might sound harsh, but it's the truth of the matter.